Unable to post the following comment on Facebook: As I have said before Facebook (or Fakebook?) has restricted my ability to use Facebook. This is in addition to my exclusion from Linkedin where I made contact with numerous human rights organizations. Also I do not get any response from Twitter. I think Zuckerberg should step down from his position as head of Facebook and be replaced by someone who has a very strong belief in free speech. I think it is a case where a man (and woman) needs to accept his limitations. He created a wonderful tool for free speech but obviously has little capacity when it comes to human rights. which requires a refusal to compromise even when confronted by the powerful interests promoting a New World Order which requires a form of totalitarianism dominating each country.

My recent post provides a brief summary of my research findings: I am a human rights author (2 books), activist and outsider (28yrs) from Auckland, New Zealand. My question: why is my book being ignored? Ethical Human Rights: Freedom’s Great Hope (American Academic Press, 2017). It shows that in 2008 the UN created a new globally dominant ideology I call neoliberal absolutism (the fake global media did not report it. I found it more by accident than design). I consider neoliberal absolutism is evil because people would not be able to think for themselves or even have a conscience of their own. Later I was to realize that the stupid (within collectives) would exploit the intelligent often more independent. In dependent minds are hated. Neoliberal absolutism rebalanced global ideological and economic power from the West to the Rest and I show it was the real cause of the GFC2008. It determines the decline of the West and global freedom in preparation for a form of totalitarianism to dominate States required for the UN’s OWG Agenda (New World Order). To my knowledge it is in no American library. Ethical human rights is firmly based on the UDHR and unlike neoliberal absolutism the ideology for a OWG has no human rights omissions. Ethical human rights, which emphasizes sovereignty, would replace neoliberal absolutism. My book has been severely suppressed and I believe I have been blacklisted. However it is selling (I think) on Google Books and Amazon. It took 2 1/2 yrs for me to get one copy in New Zealand libraries. It was the great majority of States which ensured the human rights omissions to create neoliberal absolutism. The major dissent came from America although it had some support from the American Camp, Canada, Britain, Australia and Japan. It is obvious to me that the Democrats are promoting the UN’s OWG Agenda even though the world is moving closer to emphasizing sovereignty. In my view, with Biden in control America is likely to oppose those countries e.g. Russia, which emphasizes sovereignty. As I am a virtual nobody from New Zealand I have not been able to make an impact which I believe provides a relatively simple explanation for what is taking place. The control exercised by the Democrats globally can only be described as phenomenal.

My post on America First, Sebastian Gorka: Whoever becomes President there is still hope. The ethical human rights, which I promote emphasizes sovereignty. It would replace the New World Order or One World Government of the United Nations. While Trump promotes western culture the Democrats, in my view, have been promoting the UN’s NWO. There is a need for ethical human rights, which is firmly based on the Universal Declaration, to become widely known. Ethical human rights is described in detail in my books, in particular, Ethical Human Rights: Freedom’s Great Hope (American Academic Press 2017). I consider it means people will have to address almost surely their greatest fear – thinking. Replacing the NWO would remove the Democrats global ideological support leaving them to promote sovereignty rather than globalization.

Upside Down World. My post on a German website: Because ‘they’are obsessed with power. They seek absolute control so need a very fearful population. People often do not realize it but the world has been turned on its head – the stupid are in control and exploit the intelligent. It all stems from the UN which gives the collectives dominance over the independent people (whereas the UDHR emphasizes the individual). The individuals within collectives are controlled by loyalty and ideology so are incapable of thinking for themselves. Thinking for oneself involves enormous effort so people join collectives so they can focus on power/money. They invariably add nothing to the world and get any new ideas often for nothing from the independent people. Because what they believe in is not universal i.e. for all, they have compromised their souls and are virtually all ‘dead people’. Invariably,, despite being their choice they blame the independent people for losing their soul. They, in my view, are to be pitied.

My comment on NZ Political Forum: Look capitalism does not mean a great deal to me but if people cannot see that ideology i.e. neoliberalism/globalization, has greatly distorted capitalism then they are plain stupid. Of course, the far greater emphasis on the global rather than domestic freemarket would have an enormous effect while neoliberalism aims to eliminate individual self-determination i.e. the seeking of truth, hopes and dreams – the latter is the engine room of capitalism where so many genius ideas are born. I get so tired of talking to stupid people!!!

My tweet: in America (and NZ) I see the stupid in control exploiting the intelligent. It is a war between the collectives vs the independent people with the former consisting of individuals incapable of thinking for themselves.

My tweet: Those planning to hold Michigan governor on trial for being a traitor sounds more in the nature of a citizen’s arrest.

My tweet: Re Plan to kidnap Michigan governor: I consider the Democrats are traitorous because they are promoting the UN’s New World Order rather than sovereignty and western culture (see my books).

My tweet to Donald Trump: If America adopted ethical human rights it could retain its freedoms while addressing welfare needs e.g. health. Ethical human rights emphasize sovereignty and would prove virtually unbeatable at the UN replacing the latter’s NWO Agenda, https://outsiderethicalhumanrights.home.blog

Low cunning and gross deceit in the creation of the NZ bill of rights act 1990.

Posted on Spiritual Renaissance New Zealand Unleashed: The NZ bill of rights act 1990 is being cited more frequently on NZ sites. In my book I did an analysis of the bill. It describes the hijacking of the bill. It states that ‘the bill of rights was passed by only 36% of parliament and that the bill of rights was ‘by and for’ a left minority all of them Labor MPs’. I describe how the bill contained less than half the human rights in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and how it reflected a UN Agenda which determined the decline of western civilization and global freedom. I show how the bill was driven by the bureaucrats from behind closed doors (I witnessed the creation of the latter deep State when working for the Justice Department in 1984) such that if your human rights were omitted you were overlooked, for example, children’s and family rights were omitted. It also resulted in discrimination against intelligent white males leading to the mass exodus of the best and brightest from the country. I hold Sir Geoffrey Palmer (PM at the time and architect of the bill) and Helen Clark (deputy PM at the time) to account. I describe their low cunning and gross deceit and strongly believe I proved it. I also made a stand on principle and appeared in the Auckland High Court where I described how many New Zealanders were discriminated against on the grounds of social class leaving them crushed and isolated. High Court Judge, Lynn Stevens, agreed with me asking why I did not inform New Zealand earlier. In my view, a number of the best and brightest who did not escape the country often ended up in the mental health and criminal justice systems. I also propose an ethical bill of rights which would ensure no human rights omissions. I consider it would also be a great value to Maori social outcasts if a Maori brave enough to challenge their elite appeared. Also ethical human rights would replace the New World Order which, in my view, is driving the UN Agenda. And because ethical human rights are universal i.e. for all, those on this site may see how this also reflects the soul. In my view, this would mean that people would not have to compromise their souls for the sake of ideology resulting in ‘dead people’.