Today’s world – all explained by human rights.

Ethical human rights provide a simple explanation for what is taking place. It simply requires people to see that it is the rules that permit the 1% to have such excessive wealth. And my book shows that the rules are human rights whose manipulation by the UN is all that is needed to know to explain what is happening. It is the great majority of States at the UN that manipulate human rights in their own interest to oppress the majority of their populations.

Democrats (US) and Labor Party (NZ) follow an ‘evil’ UN ideology.

My tweet: EVIL. In my view, the Democrats (US) and Labor Party (NZ) are following an ‘evil’ ideology which my book shows was created at the UN on 10 Dec 2008. It rebalanced ideological and economic power from the West to the Rest and was the real cause of the GFC 2008.

Why America hates economic, social and cultural rights.

Why America hates economic, social, and cultural rights.There is a reason why America is so opposed to the economic, social and cultural rights promoted by Bernie Sanders. In my view, it is because the great majority of States at the UN cannot be trusted to interpret it properly. They will turn it into an authoritarianism which a number of socialist countries are known for.

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights consists of two sets of rights – civil and political rights (akin to the American constitution) e.g. freedom of speech, and economic, social and cultural rights e.g. the rights to education, health, accommodation etc.

Apart from my book the following has been hidden from humanity. On the 10 Dec 2008 the UN excluded a number of human rights to create a new globally dominant ideology which I call neoliberal absolutism and which I now see as the ideology for a New World Order or One World Government (this was not reported by the global mainstream media but is detailed in full in my last book. It is verifiable with sources). I have written about it often since my book was published in early 2017 but I lack the authority to make an impact.

America was the major opposition to neoliberal absolutism on 10 Dec 2008 although had some support from the American Camp, Canada, Britain, Australia and Japan . American exceptionalism virtually saved the world from enormous compliance with the NWO which requires nearly all States to have a form of totalitarianism.Neoliberal absolutism rebalanced global ideological and economic power from the West to the Rest. I also show it was the real cause of the GFC2008 which in my opinion will be ongoing. It is promoted by the left so-called liberals (Democrats in US Labour Party in NZ) in the form of neoliberalism and globalization. Right wing politic could do much to expose them but do not largely, in my view, because the corporations benefit.

Unlike nearly all States America has not ratified the covenant on economic, social, and cultural rights in my view for fear that the great majority of States will turn it into a form of authoritarianism not uncommon amongst socialist states. America, in my view, considers it safer not to ratify the covenant on economic, social and cultural rights because the great majority of States cannot be trusted to interpret it properly and even because a Democratically led America cannot be trusted.

It is not surprising that the ethical human rights I promote received the support on the internet of the American State Department, the Open Democracy Initiative of the White House and others even including the UN itself (again the mainstream media refused to report it). Ethical human rights are firmly based on universal human rights truth as in the UDHR and unlike neoliberal absolutism has no human rights omissions so there is no fear of an authoritarian socialism. Although Bernie Sanders democratic socialism would also help guard against an authoritarian socialism.

Ethical human rights require States to ensure, at least, all the core minimum of all the human rights in the UDHR. Individual States can provide higher levels of human rights according to their means. I think America would support ethical human rights but cannot trust the UN.

Because there is no question of an authoritarian government being created and because only the core minimum of economic, social and cultural rights are to be ensured it would not be an undue burden on the State. Consequently I would not call economic, social and cultural rights socialism rather I call it an enlightened welfare particularly necessary in times of depression or the present coronavirus.

Where Bernie Sanders and President Trump both go wrong in my view is their emphasis on the working class. While I have little doubt that the latter were regarded as deplorables and discriminated against on the grounds of social class. However, in my view, all the collectives combine in some degree to oppress the independent people. What I consider America should be focused on are potential superheroes who can forge new paths into the future. It is the latter which led to the dominance of western civilization (see my post ‘Become backward or take society forward’, on my bog, https://outsiderethicalhumanrights.home.blog ). What my book shows very clearly is that it is the aim of the UN to oversee the decline of western civilization and global freedom by excluding a number of human rights. For example, it omitted individual self-determination i.e. the seeking of truth, hopes and dreams (sometimes described as the iconic American superhero). Also it failed to ensure the prohibition of social class discrimination. And to destroy the then dominant white male elite required the removal of meritocracy with intelligent white males replaced by giving affirmative action to those regarded as victims i.e. blacks, women and gays. The removal of intelligent whites helped ensure that government policies were not challenged by individuals who had a strong belief in western culture. Furthermore, affirmative action only applied at the professional level while women, blacks and gays lower on the social scale, who would have suffered the most from historic discrimination, were omitted by being discriminated against on the grounds of social class.But the non-inclusion of children as victims exposes the real intent to exclude intelligent white males. Children are genuine victims because they have virtually no choice in their poverty and abuse. In addition, they cannot help themselves by voting or giving donations to political parties.I lack the authority to impress upon people the enormous effect of social class discrimination. It should not be surprising that poor blacks gain much police attention as do the poor in general. It should not be surprising that the ongoing riots often involve looting and stealing from businesses. And it should not be surprising that blacks are well overrepresented in the prison population. But what is surprising is the incredible lack of intellect that exists. Nearly all academics are ideologically controlled while often those that do speak out are sporting figures and celebrities not known for their intellect. While, in my view, ‘black lives matter’ are driven by self-interest not truth.

In my book I describe the omission of individual self-determination and how such individuals wanting to be masters of their own destiny require both sufficient self-help rights i.e. civil and political rights and sufficient survival rights i.e. economic, social and cultural rights or an enlightened welfare.

My book, ‘Ethical Human Rights: Freedom’s Great Hope’ while published in America (American Academic Press 2017) to my knowledge is in no American library. It has been severely suppressed and neither Donald Trump or Bernie Sanders will inform Americans of its existence. It describes the above in much greater detail. America, for all its faults, as leader of the free world remains the hope of billions on the planet.

Person who attacked Christchurch Mosques a very politically sensitive issue.

Just received an apology from Facebook: “We’re sorry we got this wrong. We reviewed your post again and it does follow our Community Standards” see the previous post regarding Brendon Tarrant which had been removed by Facebook. I also received a cordial visit from the police. The post was:

For your interest: my email to Brenton Tarrant’s lawyer, Philip Hall. Brenton Tarrant is charged with the attack on Mosques in Christchurch and killing many Muslims:I understand you are representing Brenton Tarrant. I am a human rights author (two books), activist and outsider from Auckland, New Zealand. I do not know whether this is very relevant or not but in my last book I described how intelligent white males were discriminated against because of affirmative action being given other groups. Such affirmative action is permitted by the NZ bill of rights Act. This discrimination is indicated by the mass exodus of intelligent white males from the country – most going to Australia,Because intelligent white males are not informed of how they are being discriminated against some are very likely to blame various minority groups.

The battle within helps you prepare for the battle without.

Comments on Schizophrenia Support Group:

  • Anthony RavlichAnthony Ravlich In my view, the above is so true. It is why I have been beside myself trying to tell people that the right to individual self-determination has been omitted in international human rights law and invariably in national constitutions. But what can I say ordinary people do not know what I am talking about while academics are under strict control to say nothing. What is individual self-determination? It is the ability to seek truth hopes and dreams sometimes depicted by the American superhero e.g. Steve Jobs would be one..The UN’s OWG or NWO wants to rid the world of geniuses who pose a threat to the UN’s wish for absolute control. Depriving individuals of the ability to think and speak for themselves means there will be very little progress – the world will eventually come to a halt. I imagine in the case of Africa given that I am aware of how their leaders voted at the UN that blacks are prevented from thinking for themselves so have to resort to begging other countries. We are now living in countries where dreams are suppressed and consequently are unable to reach their full potential. What a terrible indictment on humanity!!!’Can I ask you Joseph Igomene or anyone else do you have any ideas as to what can be done about this situation? My book has been severely suppressed and no one will discuss it with me yet my work is verifiable and I provide sources.
    • Joseph Igomene I hear your concern, Anthony Ravlich, with respect to Self-determination. Yet, outside of freedom of speech, freedom of religion, abided by the Constitution what more can one ask for when it comes to self-determination? Where you said, “Depriving individuals of the ability to think and speak for themselves means there will be very little progress – the world will eventually come to a halt. ” Who you talking about? I’m guessing “peers,” people experiencing emotional recovery, spiritually? If so, I’d say this is more a personal challenge for each one us and it’s a matter of joining a movement where peers are helping peers.
    • Anthony Ravlich Saving one’s own soul is of course the priority. I repeat my beliefs to myself constantly. But people need to be informed of the gross human rights malpractice at the UN which seems to be in conformity with Agendas 21/30. I describe how an ‘evil’ ideology, neoliberal absolutism, was created at the UN on 10 Dec 2008. It rebalanced global ideological and economic power from the West to the Rest as well as being the real cause of the GFC 2008. It failed to protect against exploitation meaning the Corporations could relocate to countries with cheap labor without fear of exploitation being prohibited. It also gave Asian countries particularly China the ability to exploit a vast workforce and gain the considerable competitive advantage over the West. But it is not just the west global freedom itself is seriously threaten i.e. civilization itself. Yet all this is ignored – it was not reported by the global mainstream media. I need to find some brave academics to inform people. I have been kept isolated since I began promoting human rights in 1991 so although I have written two books I am a virtual nobody. The ethical human rights I promote will eliminate neoliberalism, globalization and neoliberal absolutism. It strongly favors sovereignty and so eliminates the UN’s OWG or NWO.. After gaining some remarkable support on the internet the mainstream media have refused to inform people. I regard neoliberal absolutism which will ensure a form of totalitarianism in all countries as ‘evil’ While prioritizing my own soul I have had to come to terms with this virtually completely alone but I am sure that somewhere out there there is an academic brave enough to confirm my research findings but anyone with some authority would be a great help.
    • Anthony Ravlich PS. In my earlier life the inner battle I engaged in at the profound level (which many on this page are engaged in) helped me considerably in the real- life battle which was to come

The Fake Left Liberals are a social class.

My comment on Yellow Jackets World Awakening NZ Branch: It is what I have been trying to tell NZers for many years without success. What took over in 1984 was a left social class (you would have heard of the class system in the UK). It is a social class which discriminates on the grounds of social class which has resulted in many of the problems we face. It is this social class which promotes the UN OWG or NWO agenda with the considerable support of right wing politics. The present Labor Party is very different from previous Labor Parties. For example, the present fake left liberals promote collective thinking and expression (the fake media being their voice). By contrast Labor Parties prior to 1984 were true liberals promoting individual freedom of thought, conscience and expression. The collectivism of the present Labor Party is seen by an increasing number as being akin to communism and they are often like-minded with totalitarian and repressive States.

War ?

My comment on the video,’ Áustralia sharpening its teeth to be ready for communist China’, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0oQExE1E_FM: I could not agree more with Aust PM Scott Morrison who compares today’s world with the 1930s just prior to the second world. As then we are seeing the rise of totalitarianism. I believe there is a way of avoiding war but despite enormous attempts on my part western States seem to find it too hard. My book recommends that the west boycott the UN until it includes the many human rights omissions which result in the promotion of totalitarian and repressive States. If they do not have the courage to boycott the UN then they should address who I consider to be their worst enemy which is within – the left fake liberals which I consider is promoting the UN agenda which aims to destroy western culture to permit the rise of totalitarianism which would be compatible with the UN’s OWG or NWO agenda. I consider the fake left-liberals discriminate on the grounds of social class and the prohibition of social class discrimination would greatly reduce their power.

Leave me out of this human rights group.

My comment on a group of 84 formed by prominent human rights activist Shulamith Koenig who once told me she believed every word I said: Please leave me out of this group. I am not one of you. I can relate because I pity you not hate you but I choose who my friends are. I believe in universal human rights truth as in the UDHR and you do not. In my recent book (and do not buy it because you could not accept my research findings) I ‘prove’ the creation of a new globally dominant ideology (surely for a OWG or NWO) at the UN on 10 Dec 2008. I regard it as évil’because people would not be able to think for themselves or even have a conscience of their own. So it is not surprising the UN is promoting totalitarian and repressive States. So I disagree with your ‘leader’Shulamith Koenig that you are good people. Abject obedience to that which is evil does not make you good. You have virtually no hope of escape from your social prisons. However I do have some hope in future generations who can fight for ethical human rights and rid the world of the OWG or NWO as well as neoliberalism, globalization and neoliberal absolutism all of which require many human rights omissions.