The spiritual war between good and evil is very easy for me to see.

The spiritual war between good and evil. It is very easy for me to see how evil can take over. In my book, I ‘prove’ the creation of an evil ideology at the UN on 10 Dec 2008. I call it neoliberal absolutism and consider it as evil because people would not be able to think for themselves or even have a conscience of their own. What they want is robots in future totalitarian States. My work is verifiable with sources yet the global mainstream media refused to report it. Its effects were enormous: it majorly rebalanced global ideological and economic power from the West to the Rest as well as being the real cause of the GFC 2008 which impacted by far the worse on the EU. To my utter amazement since the book was published in early 2017 I could find no academic in the world prepared to discuss it. The book has been severely suppressed. Given such phenomenal ideological control over academics and politicians, I keep trying to inform people but after 30 years of virtual silence, ordinary people refuse to discuss it. So I can just repeat that it is very easy for me to see how evil can take over. It is control versus freedom. We are, in my view, in a spiritual war between good and evil.

Peaceful slaves and evil genius.

Peaceful slaves and evil genius. My post on Radical Philosophy: In my book I describe how Helen Clark focused on achieving a peaceful society, Safety was all the rage and seems to get much female support. NZ rose to be one of the most peaceful societies in the world. But the cost was enormous. Helen Clark’s thinking was that by ensuring sufficient food and accommodation but crushing potential peace could be achieved. The crushing of potential also required the elimination of the then socially dominant group largely intelligent, white males from western culture. This was achieved by providing affirmative action i.e. preferential treatment, for those considered to have been previously oppressed e.g. women and Maori..The latter meant that intelligent, white males could be excluded i.e.the expression of truth would likely alert the masses to what was going on. There was a mass exodus of intelligent, white males overseas leaving, in my opinion, a less than mediocre professional sector. Rather the affirmative action should have gone to women and Maori lower on the social scale who surely would have suffered the most from historical discrimination. What, in my view, Helen Clark really wanted was a more obedient professional sector who would not challenge government policies.Many males unable to reach their full potential resorted to drugs and alcohol. Many who did not escape overseas often ended up in the mental health and criminal justice systems. Helen Clark and Sir Geoffrey Palmer, I describe their low cunning and gross deceit, achieved the crushing of the potential of the nation using the NZ bill of rights act 1990 which allowed for affirmative action and social class discrimination allowing the fake liberals in the media to exclude the voices of the oppressed. I show how the bill of rights was driven by bureaucrats (the deep State, I witnessed its creation) behind closed door so if your human rights were excluded you were overlooked. Those that suffered considerably from the latter where children and families whose rights were not included. A major omission, in my view, was the right to individual self-determination i.e. the seeking of truth, hopes and dreams (sometimes depicted by the iconic America superhero, a superhero because he can forge new paths into the future) , My book has been severely suppressed but a copy can be found in the Birkenhead library but also selling on Amazon and Google Books. I have sought to debate the above with female academics without success while the men hide behind the women’s skirts.My research findings are verifiable with sources provided, my blog, is https:// outsiderethicalhumanrights.home.blog. I am prepared to debate this with any female academic but I am very sure none will.

Understanding the enemy even if psychopaths.

My response to a comment made on my recent post ‘New World Order???’: Yes, psychopaths are the right words. To understand your enemy you have to be like them but without destroying one’s own soul. Extremely difficult to do but unless one understands them you would hate them and play into their hands. Because what they want is to destroy your soul and mentality so they can control you. So rather than hate them I pity them so still see them as human and when necessary relate to them but I do not hold back and tell them the hard truth and strangely they often seem to accept that. I do not wish to see violence but I think they seem to have gone too far for that. baring a miracle.

Why blame capitalism?

My comment on Wake Up Kiwis by Carol Sakey: In my view, the emphasis of capitalism should be on the domestic free market not the global free market. Globalization meant that the emphasis was on the latter. Neoliberalism seeks the elimination of individual self-determination i.e. seeking of truth, hopes and dreams ( often depicted by the iconic American Superhero – a superhero because he can forge new paths into the future). The severely backward intellects on the left promote globalization and/or neoliberalism which is destructive of capitalism and then blames capitalism for all our problems. But they will not debate it with me – rather they hide behind women’s skirts. Being the more obedient gender women are much preferred by those who seek a NWO or OWG which aim to have a form of totalitarianism in all States. But anyone who reads my book will see how ludicrous it is to have a UN presiding over a OWG given what I see as their low cunning and gross deceit. There is in no way they can be trusted.

PS. I promote both civil and political rights and economic, social, and cultural rights. The latter used to be called socialist rights but I am strongly anti-totalitarian. So the fake left-liberals cannot call me fascist.

New World Order or Ethical Human Rights???

New World Order??? You can not say you have no choice in the matter. I have written two books on ethical human rights that provide an alternative to the OWG or NWO. Whereas the latter requires human rights omissions ethical human rights are firmly based on universal human rights truth as in the UDHR. The human rights omissions strongly favor elites while the great majority of humanity will be severely oppressed, Fighting for ethical human rights will rid the world of a OWG or NWO, I am not religious but believe in God. In my view, there is presently a battle between good and evil, HTTP://outsiderethicalhumanrights.home.blog.

I believe Black Lives Matter is fraudulent.

I believe Black Lives Matter is fraudulent. Tolerance of different cultures while very important can be taken too far. This is strongly indicated by the research findings in my recent book (there is a copy in the Birkenhead library). That one death went global is because the fake liberal left is following a UN OWG agenda to destroy western culture. What is actually happening is a battle between good and evil, see HTTP://outsiderethicalhumanrights.home.blog..

Catholic Archbishop describes eternal struggle between good and evil occurring now.

My comments on “Archbishop Vigano’s powerful letter to President Trump: Eternal struggle between good and evil plying out right now” (June 6, Lifesite).

In my view, God gives people a choice between good and evil. What will New Zealand choose? What legacy will be left for future generations?

 It has gone from the intellectual level to the much higher spiritual level and far fewer will be able to cope with this apart from going to church. As I see it the stakes are now much higher and nuclear war much more likely. So many still seem to be at the pre-intellectual emotional level.