THE TRUTH FOUND. I am a human rights author (2 books), activist, and outsider (28yrs) from Auckland, New Zealand. I began seeking truth in 1984 and very strongly believe I found it. It is a human rights truth but all that people really need to know. Many people may think it impossible to find the truth but overlook the fact that someone in unique circumstances can. It is important that people know it is possible just as it is important that people know Bannister ran a sub-4-minute mile or that Hillary conquered Everest. Otherwise people would regard it as impossible. The human rights truth is spelled out in my last book published in America in early 2017. It has chapters on the United Nations, Bangladesh, and a huge section on New Zealand. I have made numerous posts since 2017 telling people that I have found the human rights truth but I do not seem to be getting through to people (see my blog, outsiderethicalhumanrights.home.blog. Because the human rights truth has been found it is now known what needs to be done to resolve our major problems. I give human rights solutions. People can ring me without giving their name and I will tell them my research findings and answer questions. My landline is (09) 9409658. Don’t ring me on the internet as I am rarely dressed appropriately and also do not email me as I am taking things far easier and I am very unlikely to reply. While I think it will take a miracle to save NZ from the worst because of my ethical human rights plan I do have some hope in future generations.

My PostScript on a German website: PS. If the EU adopted ethical human rights they would only hold States to account for extreme violence and extreme poverty. Higher levels of human rights would be determined by the democratic process within States i.e.State would have considerable sovereignty and could protect themselves from a EU following the OWG agenda of the UN. It would be apparent to anyone who has read my book that the gross deceit and low cunning of the UN means it would be ludicrous to allow them to preside over a OWG. But am I still talking to myself? Do you know anyone else in the world who claims to have found the human rights truth!!!???

On the Vinny Eastwood show I was asked what is my ethical plan: Anthony Ravlich, Thanks for asking me. Ethical human rights require that all States ensure at least the core minimums of all the rights in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.Ethical human rights are firmly based on universal human rights truth as exists in the UDHR, Because all human rights are included ethical human rights would replace what presently exists – a number of human rights omissions which ensure neoliberalism, globalization and neoliberal absolutism which is the ideology of a one world government i.e. ethical human rights would rid the world of a OWG. The present human rights omissions have determined the decline of western civilization and global freedom. New Zealand bill of rights 1990 omits near half the human rights in the UDHR. I propose an ethical bill of rights. The present bill of rights is driven by bureaucrats behind closed doors – if your human rights were omitted you were overlooked. Some obvious examples are children’s and family rights which were omitted in the bill of rights and as a consequence there are high levels of child poverty and family violence. The bill of rights also gave affirmative action for professional women and Maori which allowed intelligent white males to be overlooked leading to a mass exodus of the best and brightest overseas resulting in the severe dumbing down of New Zealand. Those who did not escape the country often ended up in the mental health and criminal justice systems. Now when NZ needs the best and brightest the most – because they are often the most articulate – the State can easily remove freedoms in preparation for the forthcoming OWG. The former is all explained in great detail in my recent book – see my blog, outsiderethicalhumanrights. I have made constant posts since my book was published in 2017 and it has been mind-numbing for me that it has been virtually ignored. It has also been severely suppressed e.g. although published in America to my knowledge it is in no American library – also while I had no trouble getting my first book accepted by NZ libraries it took 2 1/2 years before I could NZ libraries to accept a copy my second book (it is in the Birkenhead library, a friend paid for it). Wrt NZ I hold Sir Geoffrey Palmer (architect of the bill and PM at the time) and Helen Clark (deputy PM.at the time) to account.If ethical human rights were fought for it would result in a far better New Zealand and world.Just because people were unable to find the human rights truth it does not mean that no one else could because of their unique circumstances.

My comment on the Vinny Eastward show: In my view, Facebook has been taken over by evil. It is the OWG agenda of the UN. In my recent book (has been severely suppressed) I describe in detail the creation of neoliberal absolutism on 10 December 2008. I see Neoliberal Absolutism as the ideology of an OWG. I regard the latter ideology as evil because people would not be able to think for themselves or even have a conscience of their own. The book also describes in detail the low cunning and gross deceit of the UN which makes any pretentions of presiding over an OWG as ludicrous (see my blog,outsiderethicalhumanrights.home.blog.

My comment on the Vinny Eastwood show: Anthony Ravlich Its all very simple really described in detail in my severely suppressed book (2017). The UN has left out many human rights to create a new globally dominant ideology, neoliberal absolutism, on 10 Dec 2008. The latter I see as the ideology for a One World Government. I regard it as evil because people will not be able to think for themselves or even have a conscience of their own. I think it will take a miracle to save the world from a OWG but my book includes an ethical approach to human rights which have no omissions and which future generations can fight for and rid themselves of the OWG. Lets hope the children are brighter and braver than today’s people

‘China criticizes New Zealand over support for Taiwan at World Health Organization’, https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm….
I sent the following email (apart from the introduction) to the Deputy Director of the Taiwan Embassy in Auckland which I visited and am hopeful of a response:
“I promote ethical human rights which requires that all States ensure, at least, the core minimum of all the rights in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Ethical human rights are firmly based on universal human rights truth as in the UDHR. It would eliminate both neoliberalism and globalization which require a number of human rights omissions. Initially, I received considerable support on the internet e.g. the US State Department, the Open Democracy Initiative of the White House, even the United Nations itself, and a number of other organizations such as Save the Children (US). However, the mainstream media would not report it.
From 2004 to 2008 I followed the discussions at the UN on an Optional Protocol for the Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights. The latter was adopted by the UN General Assembly on 10 December 2008. Just prior I recognized the enormous importance of this OP which gained equal status with the OP to the Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. America has never ratified the covenant on economic, social, and cultural rights. The effect was that global ideological and economic power was rebalanced from the West to the Rest.
In addition, economic, social, and cultural rights are meant to protect against exploitation but the UN failed to ensure this so those countries e.g. China, were able to continue to exploit a vast workforce. In my view, this decision by the UN portends a global slave economy.
I consider the decisions of the UN on 10 Dec 2008 were the real cause of the Global Financial Crisis of 2008 because Corporations could relocate the countries with cheap labor without fear of exploitation being prohibited. It was the European Union that suffered by far the most from the GFC 2008.
The decisions made at the UN on 10 December 2008 were never reported in the global mainstream media and I have found my book severely suppressed. For example, while my book was published in America to my knowledge it is in no American library. After 2 ½ years, the Birkenhead library in Auckland did accept a copy of my book. I have been virtually persona non grata in New Zealand since I began promoting human rights in 1991. I believe the latter is because of my focus on the human rights truth and later my belief in ethical human rights. The global establishment, including academia, is virtually all ideologically controlled so greet me with silence.
Because ethical human rights are firmly based on universal human rights truth as in the UDHR I was able to see that international human rights law which is mean to reflect the Universal Declaration left out many human rights a decision of the great majority of the States in the UN General Assembly. It was very largely America with some support from the American camp e.g. Britain, Canada, Australia, and Japan, which opposed the OP.
The UN now promotes totalitarian and repressive States which certainly seems to be the reason Taiwan has been excluded, even as observer status, from the World Health Organization, seemingly following China’s ‘One-China policy’.
I would be more than happy to discuss this with you further. Although you may very well be aware of much that I have said above to my knowledge I am the only person in the world writing about the UN decisions on 10 Dec 2008 as well as the only person promoting ethical human rights although I have gained some small support.
In my human rights work, I have always had a duty to inform people of important human rights truth so I want my book to be as widely known as possible. As an outsider, I am subject to overwhelming control, and my ability to make my book well known is extremely limited. Perhaps Taiwan has access to news outlets.
Exposing what I see as the low cunning and gross deceit of the UN would be better than blaming China for the coronavirus pandemic. In my view, it is premature to assign blame until an independent international investigation into the origins of the coronavirus takes place. Lack of trust means that China may well not agree to such an investigation for some time.
However, the UN may well take a more positive view of Taiwan’s wish to be formally recognized as part of the WHO if my book became more widely known.
My book is ‘Ethical Human Rights: Freedom’s Great Hope’ (American Academic Press, 2017). It is selling on Google Books and Amazon. There is one copy in the Birkenhead library. My recent posts can be found on my blog, outsiderethicalhumanrights.home.blog “.

The Coronavirus Pandemic:

I was suspicious from the start of the coronavirus pandemic but am becoming more suspicious of China’s involvement, perhaps it’s deliberate biological warfare or perhaps gross negligence,  as evidence is increasingly pointing to the Wuhan laboratories as the source of the coronavirus (see documentary https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Le_rfTdayLs).

What aroused my suspicions from the beginning and what is being overlooked in many of the discussions on the coronavirus and Wuhan is the One World Government agenda of the United Nations described in my recent book. China also seems to be a favoured State at the UN. OWG would require States to be controlled by a form of totalitarianism which I considered would require something very drastic such as a pandemic, particularly in western States, to crush freedom in preparation for totalitarian control.

Perhaps not surprisingly my book has been severely suppressed (e.g. although published in America to my knowledge it is not in any American library). It describes the creation of a new globally dominant ideology at the UN on 10 Dec 2008 which the global mainstream media failed to report. People are often dismissive of the UN seeing it as a largely powerless body but it creates ideology e.g. neoliberalism and globalization, and those people fail to see the overwhelming power of this global ideology which could be likened to the power of ideology of the communist government in China albeit at a national level

I call the new dominant ideology created at the UN neoliberal absolutism. In my view, because it would prevent people from thinking for themselves or even having a conscience of their own I regard it as evil. My book shows how neoliberal absolutism resulted in a major rebalance of global ideological and economic power from the West to the Rest. It determined the decline of Western civilization and global freedom which in the ultimate would seriously threaten civilization itself. I show how neoliberal absolutism was the real cause of the Global Financial Crisis 2008 which impacted very largely on the EU.

I see neoliberal absolutism as the ideology of an OWG which promotes totalitarian and repressive regimes. China, in particular, was strongly favoured because the economic, social and cultural rights which the UN was addressing at the time were meant to protect against exploitation but failed to do so instead exploitation was permitted under international law so countries such as China with a vast workforce to exploit was highly favoured allowing China to get the competitive advantage over the West. Also, the Corporations were able to relocate to countries with cheap labour without fear exploitation would be prohibited. China which certainly appears to have much support from WHO, a UN organization, could be said to be promoting the UN’s OWG agenda to the extent it allowed coronavirus to become global and suppress freedoms.

Neoliberal absolutism is the creation of the great majority of States at the UN with only the US and to some extent the American camp dissenting. It was created by omitting many human rights in international human rights law which are meant to reflect the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. To correct the problem these human rights need to be included and in my book I recommend that the West boycott the UN until this happens.

Domestically the UN agenda (called neoliberalism and globalization based on human rights omissions) is promoted by left so-called liberals for the benefit of the establishment including right-wing politics and the Corporations. From my experience these left so-called liberals also control the mass media and because they discriminate on the grounds of social class exercise overwhelming control over society by excluding dissenting voices outside the establishment who are not captured by ideology. The prohibition of social class discrimination (which has been considered by the NZ Human Rights Commission) would greatly reduce the power of the left so-called liberals e.g. the poor would be allowed a voice of their own in the mainstream media.

A number of countries want an international investigation of the origins of the coronavirus in China. Given the considerable destruction of life and economies this certainly seems justified but China recently threatened Australia with trade sanctions for calling for such an enquiry (see above video).

More of my posts as well as links to my books can be found on my blog, outsiderethicalhumanrights.home.blog.

My comment on a German website discussing peace for humanity: I consider freedom is more important than peace. You can have peaceful slaves!

A discussion on my recent post on the Association of Sovereignz: Stefan Togalima Clarke: Is this a book you’ve written??? Kol
Anthony Ravlich Yes it is. There is a copy in NZ libraries (Birkenhead) but no other library in NZ or overseas, However it is selling on Google Books and Amazon but I have not been able to get any academic to review it. I am expecting a OWG to take over but my book contains an ethical approach to human rights which people can fight for and rid the world of a OWG. My problem has been I have been kept very isolated by both left and right politics so am a virtual nobody. People do not want to read a book by a nobody especially when all their lives they have been obedient to those with status and/or money above them. I am only obedient to God.
Stefan Togalima Clarke Anthony Ravlich pm you now and I know exactly what you mean

I get many requests for money from religious organizations in underdeveloped countries involved with caring for children. The following is my response to the most recent which I hope others will read before making money requests: In my view, the way to escape desperation is to teach children to reach their full potential by thinking for themselves.Unless it is a very brutal country I am sure they would find a way to take themselves and the country forward. I have lived on a State benefit since about 1984 – I keep fighting the leadership. As long as there is sufficient food it is courage that is most needed – build up the confidence of the children.