My comment on a German website discussing Bill Gates and vaccines: After doing some reading and watching Bill Gates Ted talk I get the strong impression he is following the UN’s OWG agenda and has considerable support from WHO. My comment under his TED talk entitled innovating to zero is as follows: “No one will discuss my research findings in my recent book. I found that on 10 Dec 2008 the UN omitted a number of human rights which I show would support an OWG and determines the decline of western civilization and global freedom and in the ultimate would seriously threaten civilization itself. I show how these omissions were the real cause of the GFC 2008. My findings are verifiable and I provide sources. But all the shutters came down and no one will discuss it. My book is: ‘Ethical human rights: Freedom’s Great Hope'(American Academic Press 2017). Terrorism, the migration crisis, the coronavirus epidemic very seriously undermine freedoms taking us ever closer to a OWG. I would feel a lot happier about such discussions if the UN’s omitted human rights were included otherwise they (Bill Gates and many academics) seem ideologically controlled (for elites) rather than based on universal human rights truth (UDHR) which is for all. I think only a miracle can save us from a OWG which means all States would be controlled by totalitarianism albeit a left totalitarianism or right-wing totalitarianism. Pity future generations!

In my view, the UN’s One World Government Agenda whereby all States will be controlled by a form of totalitarianism will be far worse for humanity than the coronavirus and the likely severe recession to follow. As a consequence, I agree with Donald Trump’s defunding of WHO which is a UN organization.
My recent book shows that the UN needs to be held to account for its omissions of many human rights which determine the decline of western civilization and global freedom. Because it eliminates much innovation with growth to be based on exploitation I consider that in the ultimate it will threaten civilization itself.

Tribal Maori: A line needs to be drawn to protect western culture.

There is a need to draw a line to protect western culture. I am speaking as a person who has had a close association with the underclass in Auckland since 1984. I promote an ethical bill of rights in order to help many Maori (Pakeha would also benefit). I am speaking largely about tribal Maori. While New Zealanders are to be commended for being very generous and understanding of Maori there are limits. It should not involve sacrificing one’s western culture (essentially this can be described as individual freedom of though and expression) for tribalism (which essentially involves collective thought and expression). Similarly, the promotion of diversity shows tolerance but again there are limits – it should not involve sacrificing western culture.

New Zealanders need to draw a line and if this means being accused of racism then they need to be tough enough to cope because, in my view, in today’s world racism is being used largely as a political weapon. An open discussion when you are trying to help does not amount to racism. It needs to be remembered that many New Zealanders sacrificed their lives during the second world war to defend their way of life which can be called western culture. And although loss of a livelihood can be very serious it does not involve loss of life. Some of my observations I consider need discussion are as follows: Maori at the bottom say they have never had a share in the compensation being paid to Maori. I have very rarely seen Maori ownership of small business in Auckland city. In my view, the latter has much to do with tribalism because Maori are expected to share profits with whanau. It is not surprising that in times of high unemployment that many Maori beg on the streets, have recourse to drugs/alcohol/crime. I even strongly suspect poor school achievement is associated with the lack of ability to follow their dreams realizing that small business is not an option. There seems to be a large number of Maori outcasts which I attribute to discrimination on the grounds of Whakapapa i.e. discrimination on the basis of birth. Tribal loyalty is such that Maori seem unable to challenge their elite despite at one stage having two political parties chosen on racial grounds.

New Zealanders are ignorant of the nature of their own dominant elite, left so-called liberals, who are also very tribal. They fail to see that it is this dominant elite which want to undermine western culture by promoting Maori tribalism.

While my recent book shows how the Maori elite promote the Treaty of Waitangi which seems to very largely benefit the Maori elite I show how an ethical bill of rights would help Maori lower on the social scale. It would give particularly poor Maori a voice in the mainstream media where they could raise the question of a lack of a share in the compensation being paid. It would prohibit discrimination on the grounds of birth. The right to Individual self-determination i.e. the seeking of truth, hopes and dreams, would encourage independence of thought and free expression which are essential if Maori culture is to be taken forward rather than being trapped in the past.

While it would take a particularly courageous Maori to use these rights to hold their elite to account  it should be left to Maori. However, New Zealanders could support an ethical bill of rights.

My post on Bernie Sanders Activists: If there is any sanity left in the democratic party it will be seen that a country facing perhaps a severe recession will be in need of economic, social and cultural rights. But for Bernie to describe himself as a socialist conveys the wrong message because often socialist countries are authoritarian which Bernie opposes, As I have said before such rights are best described as ‘enlightened welfare’. Suspending his campaign may well be wise considering the existence of coronavirus. Surely given the severe impact of coronavirus on the black population such enlightened welfare would be to the latter’s benefit. In my view, more important than the working class is the innovation for which America is renowned for. Such innovation requires individual self-determination i.e. the seeking of truth, hopes and dreams sometimes depicted by the iconic American superhero. The latter would surely find favor with Bernie’s young supporters and motivate them to use their computers to support Bernie. They could self-isolate at the same time.

I seriously question the capacity of many women for self-honesty. From the beginning, feminist groups claimed they would save the world. But instead, it was me (excluded as with many intelligent, white males from western culture) virtually at the bottom of the social scale who derived an ethical approach to human rights which would eliminate neoliberalism and globalization which, for example, I consider would eliminate genius and, in the ultimate, lead to the destruction of civilization. Ethical human rights would be fair to everybody. I have written two books on the subject. I have yet to see the feminist’s plan to save the world. They will not debate the subject with me while the men (?) hide behind the women’s skirts.

Posted on Bernie Sanders Activists: What the coronavirus proves is that no matter how wealthy a country is money is not everything. It is a major reason why enlightened welfare which economic, social and cultural rights represent is so important. Civil and political rights are one half of the Universal Declaration of Human rights while the other half is economic, social and cultural rights similar to that proposed by Franklin Roosevelt’s second bill of rights and that proposed by Bernie Sanders.

My post on All News From New Zealand discussing Maori tribalism: In my experience (I am from Auckland and my book is in the library) if you do not stand up to Maori they will not respect you – they will walk all over you. I am courteous but keep them at an arm’s length. Their tribal loyalty makes any rational discussion virtually impossible. My book shows how New Zealand has become increasingly tribal. It shows how as the world i.e. the UN, becomes increasingly evil collectives including Maori tribalism rise to dominance.

My post on the Association for Sovereignz discussing spirituality: You may find my approach of interest. In my view. it is all about the growth of human knowledge. To achieve this you need seekers of truth. The truth needs to be sought with purity i.e. not involving money, power, or aiming for glory. Having done this you may or may not make money out of it depending whether it is fashionable, politically acceptable etc. In my personal view, this is a spiritual journey because I see God as being the absolute universal truth and in seeking truth the closer humanity gets to the absolute universal truth the closer one gets to God. You do not have to believe in God to seek the truth but I think it helps e.g. divine revelations are always possible. And it helps to get God’s OK for your work – you are more confident.

(PS. For some reason I am unable to access linkedin).

• Anthony Ravlich My further comments: Everyone has to take responsibility for their actions even the Roman Catholic Church. Anyone who has bothered to read my book will see that the UN’s low cunning and gross deceit means it can not be trusted to preside over a OWG. Perhaps one day in the distant future but not in today’s world where the great majority of State governments are consumed with phenomenal control rather than ensuring ethical human rights for their people.
  
  Anthony Ravlich I actually sympathize with Catholics because they have been treated very badly over the past 30 years. One thing I have admired about the Catholic church is the way it stuck by its beliefs. But there is a price to pay – enormous hatred has been directed at them stemming mainly from the fake left-liberals. I have tried to help them on many occasions but like the rest of the establishment, they say nothing.
• Anthony Ravlich Still a further comment: Peace was sought in New Zealand and it was achieved being rated as being one of the most peaceful countries in the world. But it was achieved by crushing the potential of people (also the means to the end of the UN). This was similar to how the Dalits (untouchables) of SE Asia were treated. Their potential was severely crushed and they have been peaceful. In NZ it led to the mass exodus of the best and brightest ensuring the truth has been rarely heard. Many of those who remained in NZ ended up in the mental health and criminal justice system. Many taking drugs to cope with the phenomenal control preventing them from bettering themselves. Yes NZ has been very peaceful but is it a life worth living!? Perhaps if NZers believed in the anthem God defend NZ things might not have become so bad. I do this very largely out of duty since 1991 when I adopted the Universal Declaration as my belief system. Many years ago I felt enormous pressure to leave the country but I decided to stay and keep fighting. I am not unhappy, in fact, I have achieved a certain inner peace which helps me continue the fight. Why should many have been forced out of the country, ended up in the mental health and criminal justice system, when for many their only real crime was being intelligent.

Masks4All

I will be getting my mask tomorrow. I have often talked about the human rights omitted at the UN as being responsible for many of the problems we face in today’s world. One of those omissions is Article 29 (1) which states: ‘Everyone has duties to the community in which alone the free and full development of his personality is possible’. I promote ethical human rights which is firmly based on universal human rights truth as in the Universal Declaration. Under ethical human rights the prime duty of the State is to ensure the ethical human rights of their own people and where possible there are global duties to help those countries unable to ensure ethical human rights for their people. I think China where the coronavirus originated from has a particular responsibility here e.g. providing masks. Wearing a mask can be seen as a duty everyone has to the community and if everyone wears one all will be protected. The following video Masks4All from the Check republic explains their experience, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HhNo_IOPOtU