My comment on a post by Human Rights Defence on Linkedin: In my recent book I strongly believe I found the human rights truth which involves corruption of human rights at the UN. Even though my work is verifiable with sources no one in the establishment will discuss it with me. They are virtually all ideologically captured. My book provides a new ethical plan for humanity which is firmly based on the UDHR and would include the omitted human rights devised to keep populations backward and unable to challenge their leadership. Academics cannot be so backward that they refuse to discuss this ethical plan, Just one example, it emphasizes small/medium business rather than the corporations. Surely this would be better for climate change and protecting the habitat of wild-life. Also the corruption of the UN has determined western civilization and global freedom for a decline. I am convinced it resulted in the Global Financial Crisis 2008. Also seemingly targeting the west, in particular, is the present coronavirus epidemic. Together with the refugee crisis it will very likely crush global freedom paving the way for the UN OWG agenda. Would Human Rights Defence have the courage to make my book known to the public?. At present, it is very much suppressed.

Celibacy: In my last post I expressed my suspicion regarding the coronavirus pandemic. Again, I find it suspicious that given deaths in Italy now exceeds that in China (BBC news 19 March 2020) that Pope Francis does not appear to be promoting celibacy to Catholics in Italy given that everyone is being told to keep a distance. Given the situation celibacy would seem to have some common sense attached to it. Traditionally the Roman Catholic Church has promoted celibacy. The Church teaches that sexual intercourse has a purpose; and that outside marriage it is contrary to its purpose (Wikipedia, Catholic theology of sexuality). In my previous post I described how the United Nations is creating a One World Government (see my recent book) and that draconian measures e.g. a pandemic, would be required to gain the acceptance of people to give up many freedoms. Given that sex before marriage is so prevalent as is prostitution (a source of income for largely poor women) it may have been considered that removing the latter freedoms would prove unacceptable to people. It is interesting that the Roman Catholic Church has in the past backed a plan a One World Government: ROME, April 6–Pope Pius XII praised today the principle of world government as a means to establish peace and bring about collaboration among all the nations for the common good of mankind (New York Times, April 7, 1951, https://www.nytimes.com/1951/04/07/archives/pope-backs-plan-for-world-government-sees-it-as-a-means-to.html ).

A conspiracy theory which could be true. The following is my comment in response to a German scientist’s discussion of the coronavirus:

Excellent video. What made me suspicious about the virus is that I realized if the UN wanted to achieve its One World Government (which my recent book showed) it would need to do something very draconian to gain the acceptance of the public which will lose many freedoms. China may well have performed this function on behalf of the UN because my book shows China is a major beneficiary of the UN’s policies which promotes totalitarianism. We desperately need intellectuals/academics who are brave enough to question what is taking place because a future recession even depression is likely to take place.

Dr Wolfgang Wodarg discusses the Corona Panic:

The Washington Post describes the suggestion of US Republican Senator Tom Cotton as a conspiracy theory. Tom Cotton suggested that the ongoing spread of a coronavirus is connected to research in the disease-ravaged epicentre of Wuhan, China. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/02/16/tom-cotton-coronavirus-conspiracy/

My comment on a German website discussing discrimination against the elderly: I think the elderly are often the best of us. They taught us something extremely important “to think for ourselves”. Employing the latter our societies were more creative and we forged paths into the future. Pity those countries/cultures where obedience dominates – they are invariably backward. Of course in today’s world as the UN moves towards a one- world govt obedience is far more demanded. We have to join collectives with their group-think. But thinking for oneself still persists amongst the more independent in western culture so our ancestors must be ‘rubbished’ so we do not cling to their wisdom. There are dark forces at work!!!

My tweet: We are headed towards a one-world government. A left-wing totalitarianism or right-wing totalitarianism would be compatible and Biden’s obedience is preferred to Sanders. Question everything that is taking place!!! https://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2020/03/15/18831542.php

What happened to Franklin Roosevelt’s non-discrimination on the grounds of one’s station in life?

This is described in FDR Second Bill of Rights Speech, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3EZ5bx9AyI4 . It is equivalent to non-discrimination on the grounds of social class which I cannot find anywhere in America’s human rights law (it has also been excluded in New Zealand’s Bill of Rights Act 1990).

Domestically you can have a left wing totalitarianism or a right wing totalitarianism to achieve the United Nations agenda which my recent book (published in America in early 2017, see below) shows aims to globally crush human potential, creating backward societies, unable to challenge their leadership.

Even in a country like New Zealand which has virtually been completely taken over by left so-called liberals because I strongly believe the human rights truth is known it gives me hope.

My book deals very largely with left wing totalitarianism which I found impacted on many outside the establishment resulting in large numbers having their potential crushed with many resorting to drugs to cope with the phenomenal control inflicted while many resorted to criminality (in New Zealand’s case it led to the mass exodus of the ‘best and brightest’). In America I am sure you will find many of the best and brightest very largely intelligent, white males from a western culture (although not exclusively so) in the mental health and criminal just systems.

Affirmative action for so-called victims i.e. women, including feminists, blacks and Maori in New Zealand was used to exclude, in particular, intelligent, white males from a western culture. The latter resulted In a less than mediocre professional middleclass who regard themselves as a superior class while seeing those with different viewpoints as being of a lower station in life i.e. the deplorables.

My book shows that because of the enormous injustice inflicted on those at the bottom of the social scale affirmative action is justified, although not for professionals. For example, in my view, the blacks in Chicago should have been given the affirmative action not professionals. Women and blacks low on the social scale who would have suffered the most from historical discrimination, should have been given affirmative action rather than shooting each other or pressured in prostitution.

The major weapon of the left wing is social class discrimination which crushes human potential while the right wing use socio-economic discrimination concerned very largely with money e.g. user pays. Put simply while the left uses mind control the right uses money as a form of control.

Since my book was published I have tried to get Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders to inform people of my book without success. Although freedom of speech is in the American Constitution the book may have been suppressed because it is considered a matter of national security. The latter is because the UN agenda i.e. neoliberalism and globalization, has been determined by the great majority of States at the UN (in particular, America’s enemies) while the ethical approach to human rights I promote would eliminate both neoliberalism and globalization. Ethical human rights are firmly based on the universal human rights truth as in the UDHR. Because ethical human rights include all the human rights it would replace neoliberalism and globalization which require many human rights omissions despite the UN claiming the UDHR as its authority while the UN charter requires all States to uphold the UDHR. Neoliberalism and globalization benefit both left and right wing politics i.e. the swamp.

The human rights omissions in international human rights law can be visibly seen so are indisputable. So left liberals are based on human rights omissions which aim to destroy western culture and freedom and ultimately civilization itself. While left liberals have a right to their opinion, in my view, they have no right to discriminate on the grounds of social class. If they disagree with this then they should fight to change the UDHR.

Roosevelt’s second bill of rights may not have been accepted in America but it eventually found its way into the UDHR.

The human rights omissions e.g. the individual right to self-determination such as the seeking of truth, hopes and dreams (sometimes depicted by the iconic American superhero) ensure the crushing of human potential. The human rights omissions are invariably reflected in national constitutions (in New Zealand the bill of rights) and promoted domestically by left liberals (who I regard as a death cult) for the benefit of themselves as well as right wing politics. People need to see that the left liberals are a social class who discriminate on the grounds of social class. While they promote, follow and benefit from the human rights omissions of the UN their bottom-line is class loyalty. They are collectivists who also dominate academia and the human rights establishment and it is very rare that any will break ranks. Libertarians (who exclude economic, social, and cultural rights so fail to protect against exploitation) can be seen as the right wing equivalent.

My book shows that individual self-determination requires both civil and political rights (akin to the American constitution) and economic, social and cultural rights (as promoted by Bernie Sanders). I promote ethical human rights which simply ensures that all people, at least, should have the core minimums of all the rights in the UDHR. It is a global requirement (political parties e.g. Bernie Sanders, can promote higher levels of human rights if it is considered for example that it is affordable).

In my book I propose that ethical human rights should be reflected in domestic and international human rights law and because it includes all the human rights in the UDHR it would include the human rights omissions and so eliminate both neoliberalism and globalization.

The elimination of social class discrimination would also eliminate the right wing’s socio-economic discrimination and remove the control of the swamp.

While the suppression of my book may be considered a matter of national security it was published in America and surely would not stop the young Bernie Bros, who would want to achieve their dreams and virtually all have computers, from informing the population of my book which would not only benefit Bernie Sanders, America but the whole world where many have their potential crushed. For example, while much has been done to reduce extreme poverty people are not permitted to think for themselves, pursue individual self-determination so are unable to help themselves. Because of the latter many countries e.g. in Africa, are reduced to begging others for help or, for example, muslim majority countries blaming the west for their problems. But essentially they are too afraid to challenge their own leadership who voted to exclude many human rights.

While under ethical human rights the prime duty of the State is to ensure their own people have ethical human rights there is also a global duty to help those States unable to ensure ethical human rights for their people. Many of those States are deliberately keeping their people backward and so unable to challenge authority. So the best way to help them is through education not war because they will simply blame America etc. for killing many people and justify a violent jihad.

The depression of the 1930’s led to Franklin Roosevelt proposing economic, social and cultural rights while the left (although aided and abetted by the right) totalitarianism of the past 30 years has led to Bernie Sanders promoting economic, social and cultural rights. The present pandemic could well lead to a recession even depression times when economic, social and cultural rights will be most needed. In my view, it is best to regard economic, social and cultural rights, which is an extension of ‘the reason’ of civil and political rights, as an enlightened welfare necessary if America wants to continue its famed innovative culture i.e. you cannot have freedom without food.

If Bernie Sanders does well in the election it will give America a greater democratic mandate to promote ethical human rights at the UN which will eliminate neoliberalism and globalization and save the world from becoming backward and being controlled by a one world government. My book shows how the UN created a new globally dominant ideology which I call neoliberals absolutism which will ensure people will not be able to think for themselves or even have a conscience of their own. I show how neoliberal absolutism resulted in a major rebalance of global economic and ideological power from the West to the Rest as well as being the real cause of the global financial crisis 2008. It excluded the core minimums of economic, social and cultural rights so there was no socio-economic bottom line to protect against exploitation. The latter allowed corporations to relocate to countries with cheap labour without fear that exploitation would be prohibited under international human rights law. The major beneficiaries were those countries such as China and other Asian counties able to exploit a vast work force. The global mainstream media, dominated by left so-called liberals failed to report these decisions at the UN.

Those countries which have tried to base growth on creativity rather than exploitation e.g. the EU, were by far the worst affected.

It is a great shame my book has been suppressed i.e. to my knowledge it is not in any American library. Even this Bernie Sanders website is a closed group and my posts are seen by no more than two or three people.

But if Bernie Sanders wants to tax the corporations far more he will have to ensure that they do not relocate elsewhere and take jobs away from Americans. So, in my view, it will be necessary to hold the UN to account for its human rights omissions and so save the world peacefully.

In my view, the human rights truth (which would enable global security) is more important than any claimed national security which very likely reflects the interests of the swamp – human-kind need their human rights. Although extreme poverty has been greatly reduced (which my book shows is due to a redistribution of wealth from the West to the Rest) it is not just enough to be given food but it is also necessary to be able to help oneself otherwise you create a global dependency ripe for a totalitarian takeover and compatible with the UN’s one world government agenda.

I am a human rights author (two books), activist and outsider (28 years) from Auckland, New Zealand. Apart from 14 months I have been on a state benefit since 1984 and wrote mu books as a deplorable. The last book which exposes what happened at the UN in 2008 and how those at the bottom of the social scale were viciously oppressed is called ‘Ethical Human Rights: Freedom’s Great Hope (American Academic Press, 2017). It is being sold by the publisher, Google Books and Amazon. There is one copy in New Zealand libraries.

The lowest of the low. My response to Katie Hopkins – a very very brave individual: Anthony Ravlich Dear Katie, thanks for mentioning New Zealand which has virtually completely been taken over by the woke crowd, fake liberals who I have come to regard as a death cult. I can say after having been associated with the underclass since 1984 that these fake liberals are the lowest of the low. I pursued and strongly believe I found the human rights truth. The moral corruption occurs at the UN and most constitutions reflect it while the death cult promote it. They want totalitarian States which means that individuals will not be able to think for themselves or even have a conscience of their own. Just like you they have a way of keeping people like us in poverty. If I could I would like to invite you to New Zealand. But if you can come I can organize a speaking venue and provide free accommodation for the length of your stay. You are one very very brave lady. I am a human rights author (two books), activist and outsider (28yrs) from Auckland New Zealand. They have made sure my book has been read by exceedingly few but I can assure you I found the human rights truth which means I found the cause of most of the major problems we face and provide solutions. My work is verifiable and I provide sources. All I need is a platform in addition to the internet. I do not have the expertise to provide youtube videos.Freedom of Speech ‘no longer exists ‘ in Australia and the UK, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6WyRdz1Ix64

My latest post: Looking for platforms: I am a human rights author (two books), activist and outsider (28yrs) from Auckland, New Zealand.

You could provide me with a platform so I can tell the world about my research findings in my recent book (see below) because I am excluded by the establishment and ordinary people understand very little about human rights.
In my view, the United Nations needs to be authentic about universality i.e. human rights transparent. My recent book shows how the great majority of States have deliberately excluded a number of human rights to eliminate innovation, the ability to think for oneself and speak one’s mind. In my personal view, the latter excludes God as the creative force within. I consider this has had a devastating effect worldwide by keeping people backward and unable to help themselves (although much has been done to address extreme poverty).

In my view, and my work is verifiable and I provide sources, the UN is responsible for many of the major problems the world is facing. I propose ethical human rights which are firmly based on the UDHR so ensures universality and include the omitted human rights.

In my recent book, I describe momentous decisions made by the United Nations which the global mainstream media continue to refuse to inform people of.

I describe the creation of a new globally dominant ideology which I call neoliberal absolutism (which I regard as ‘evil’ because people would not be able to think for themselves or even have a conscience of their own). I describe how on 10 Dec 2008 it rebalanced global ideological and economic power from the West to the Rest and was the real cause of the global financial crisis of 2008 which impacted mainly on the European Union. Neoliberal absolutism certainly seems to be an ideology for a One World Government.

I show how neoliberal absolutism determines the decline of western civilization and global freedom which I consider would inevitably result in the decline of civilization itself.

The ideological control of the UN over States seems very much a taboo subject and apart from very rare exceptions I am blacklisted by the global establishment.

If you can enable me to inform the public of my research findings you would be doing humanity an enormous service.

My book is Éthical Human Rights: Freedom’s Great Hope (American Academic Press, 2017). It is selling on Amazon and Google Books and there is a copy in New Zealand libraries which could be obtained by interloan. To my knowledge no overseas library has a copy of my book.

My blog is Outsider, Ethical Human Rights

Thank you,

Anthony Ravlich MA, BSc, Dip Crim (Hons)

Chairperson

Human Rights Council (New Zealand)

10D/15 City Rd.,

Auckland City.

Ph: (0032) (09) 9409658

My further comment on Schizophrenia support: One thing that is available to people even when poor is libraries. There is almost sure to be some book you like. It is even possible with interloan to turn yourself into an expert on some subject. Doing the latter I turned myself into an expert on ethical human rights and have written two books. To most people I am a victim because I remain poor and get little recognition, in fact I am blacklisted. But I do not regard myself as a victim because I am very proud of what I have achieved because I found the human rights truth which is all people need to know to understand many of the major problems we face in the world. But this will take time because I am before my time. But I can say very forcefully that ‘the truth is out there’. But most importantly I have retained my soul and by following the truth (e.g. rather than the money) I have a certain inner peace.

The following is my response to a comment on Schizophrenia fellowship: Thanks Gillian. One needs to understand the psychopathology of the dominant elite in most countries (although this is slowly changing e.g. America, Britain, E.Europe). They (a left social class) regard themselves as victims and align themselves with victims e.g. many women, including feminists, and radical blacks (Maori in New Zealand). The latter are vindictive and want to create victims. They want to teach creative, intelligent people what it is like to be victims. Members of the left social class had to conform to ideology but intellectuals are meant to seek truth and achieve greatness i.e. reach their full potential, and being unable to do this they regard themselves as victims and want others, even geniuses, to experience what it is like. Like termites, they have infested all aspects of society over the past 30 years since the onset of neoliberalism and globalization. I think it will take time for people to see this.