Even since I have known David he has maintained that he does not have a mental illness yet he is subject to a compulsory treatment order and regularly has injections to treat what psychiatrists regard as his mental illness. David has an Honours Degree in Law and in early March, 2020, he will be appearing in court based in the mental health unit at Auckland Public Hospital. His lawyer has asked me to provide a letter in his support which I have done (see below) however I am not sure how much of it the Judge will see because his lawyer in response to the following stated:  “ I have extracted from it what I regard as most helpful to David and have drafted a statement.”

I decided to post this on the internet primarily because I have had a duty to inform people of important human rights truths since I began promoting human rights in 1991 but also because I think it would be helpful to others who are or have been involved with the mental health system. I would appreciate any feedback.

But first you might like to watch a fantastic song by Kelly Clarkson, ‘People like us’, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yWbMz_aBlMU . She describes how we are living in a ‘world of fire’. The demonic force a number experience can be seen as part of this ‘world of fire’.

To the Presiding Judge:

I have known David for about 18 years and regard him as a friend. He has often attended meetings of the Human Rights Council (New Zealand, 2001) of which I am the chairperson. I am a human rights author (two books), activist and outsider (28 years).

In relation to David’s court appearance his lawyer Anthony Rogers has asked me to comment on whether David poses a ‘serious danger’ to himself and others and whether he ‘seriously’ lacks the ability to take care of himself.

From my experience David does not fall into either of these categories. In fact, I am impressed by his ability to relate well to those members of the underclass who because of his circumstances he has little choice but to associate with. I have found David invariably presents well and on occasions I have visited David in his accommodation in downtown Auckland City. It has always been tidy.

I am sure my observation of David is also shared by his other friends who I know well.

The question is why do our observations differ so enormously from the mental health professionals? The latter’s perception of David seems very largely subjective as to my knowledge they offer no proof that David poses a serious danger to himself or others or that he cannot take care of himself.

Furthermore, I have had much involvement with the mentally ill in the community. In the early 1990’s I was chairperson (for one year) of Psychiatric Survivors Inc., Auckland.

Also, I consider the research findings of my recent book to be very relevant to David’s case. The book is ‘Ethical Human Rights: Freedom’s Great Hope’ (American Academic Press, published early 2017). It is selling on Google Books and Amazon and there is a copy in NZ libraries. In the book I show how ‘intelligent, white males from a western culture’ have been targeted for exclusion. It led to a mass exodus of the ‘best and brightest’ from New Zealand while I consider many who remained ended up in the mental health and criminal justice systems. I show how this reflects a United Nation’s agenda and I go into great detail how the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 helped fulfil this UN agenda. I also describe how after making a stand on principle I appeared in the Auckland High Court where I informed the Judge, Lynn Stevens, of a New Zealand tragedy where many at the bottom of the social scale had been ‘crushed and isolated’. I also presented the Judge with relevant social statistics. Judge Lynn Stevens agreed with me asking why I had not informed New Zealanders early. However, I was one of those victims and I was convinced no one was meant to survive the ordeal with their sanity intact and able to articulate what had happen. It took much time before I could properly explain what had taken place.

The above is relevant to David’s case because, in my view, he was one of those targeted for exclusion. It also explains why our observations of David differ so enormously from the mental health professionals, specifically the psychiatrists, who are obviously following government policy. It is early days yet and it is likely to take some time for people to understand what happened to many New Zealanders since New Zealand adopted neoliberalism and globalization in 1984. However, it is all described in my book. I am particularly concerned at the side effects of David’s medication which seem quite serious.

Yours sincerely,

Anthony Ravlich MA, BSc, Dip Crim (Hons)

Chairperson

Human Rights Council (New Zealand)

10D/15 City Rd.,

Auckland City.

Ph: (09) 9409658.

Blacklisted: throughout my promotion of ethical human rights I have been kept extremely isolated by academics and the global establishment despite my writing two books on the subject and the initial remarkable support on the internet for ethical human rights including the US State Department, Open Democracy Initiative of the White House, even the United Nations itself and others including Save the Children (US).

Ethical human rights require that States ensure at least all the core minimum of the rights in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights i.e. both civil and political rights and economic, social and cultural rights.

The latter are promoted by Bernie Sanders and provide a bigger picture than the American constitution. I consider the latter rights ensure a duty of care for all people and provide an enlightened welfare so America will never again be able to oppress half its population. An enlightened welfare because it is coupled with the American constitution e.g. freedom of speech, cannot be described as socialism as many socialist countries lack freedom of speech.

Economic, social and cultural rights will also mean America will take a global lead in human rights as I consider moral authority i.e. being in the right, is more important than military and economic might. The great majority of States have ratified the covenant on economic, social and cultural rights whereas America has not.

In my view, the major concern of the global establishment is that ethical human rights is firmly based on the Universal Declaration of Human Rights so is universal (for all i.e. equal rights so therefore fair) and would eliminate ideology such as neoliberalism and globalization which very strongly favours elites and oppresses the rest of the population.

If the UN adopted ethical human rights it would only hold States accountable for ensuring the core minimum of all the rights in the UDHR leaving States considerable sovereignty to determine higher levels of human rights. For example, States may be required to have a duty of care to some core minimum of refugees but anything in excess of this will be determined by the State itself. All States would have such a duty of care so not leaving it to some States e.g. the European Union.

Brexit while giving Britain greater sovereignty than being in the EU will still mean that ideology created at the UN will allow elites to be capable of dominating and oppressing at least half of the population as it has done in New Zealand.

That I have been blacklisted exposes the moral corruption of the global establishment which should support me given I am promoting universal human rights truth which the UN claims as its authority and the UN Charter requires that all States uphold the UDHR which is based on universal human rights truth.

I sent the following to the Honorary Consul of the Germany in Auckland as well as academics in Ireland and Scotland countries which were less supportive of Brexit but I received no response.

Dear Erich Bachmann,

I am a human rights author (two books), activist and outsider (28 years) from Auckland, New Zealand. I would like to discuss with you the possibility of gaining the German government’s support for my plan to write a book on the European Union’s adoption of ethical human rights.

I do not think Brexit would have happened if the EU had adopted the ethical human rights I promote.

Ethical human rights simply require that all countries ensure, at least, the core minimums of all the rights in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (the UN Committee on economic, social and cultural rights has determined many of the core minimums of economic, social and cultural rights).

If the EU adopted ethical human rights it would only hold countries to account for ensuring these core minimums leaving States with considerable sovereignty for determining higher levels of human rights.

For many years I have regularly posted on a German website. As you can see from my recent post (see below) I consider it very important that those countries which historically have encouraged thinking for oneself and speaking one’s mind stick together.

The latter is particularly important because as my recent book shows the UN is promoting the rise of totalitarian and repressive States which emphasize obedience which, in my view, would result in the decline of civilization.

I also sent my recent post describing genius from Germany – see ‘Become backward or take society forward’ on my blog,  https://outsiderethicalhumanrights.home.blog .

My comment on All News from New Zealand discussing Maori tribalism: Anthony Ravlich Australia is having the same problem with Aborigine tribalism as in NZ with Maori. See closing the gap is complete rubbish, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mz3Hqwnyufg my recent book shows that behind it all is a left social class which I regard as a death cult. They promote tribalism because they are very tribal themselves. By promoting tribalism they are following a UN agenda that seeks the decline in western civilization and global freedom which, in my view would lead to the decline of civilization itself. What is so despicable about the UN agenda is that it keeps many backward and unable to help themselves e.g. challenge their leadership which oppresses them e.g. treats many as outcasts. Instead, they blame the whites because, in my view, it is easier to do so. They are too afraid to challenge their own leadership – such is tribalism. Leaders that oppress you do not deserve such Aroha.

Eminent Human rights activist calls for a human rights revolution. Shulamith Koenig, the recipient of the 2003 UN prize in human rights and founder of a major NGO, PDHRE, describes the need for a human rights revolution. The following is part of a discussion I had with her on Facebook:

Anthony Ravlich

Thanks for trying anyway. I have a duty to inform people of important human rights truths and they do not. My book describes how they regard human rights as their intellectual property and as having no duty to inform people. We now live in a world of deceit. I think they will have to accept responsibility for whatever happens.

9:05 AM

Shulamith Koenig

This is why I speak about a human rights revolution!!
Too much disconnected informational of who we are as human beings!
As often loneliness and the need to belong (Alfred Adler ) allows manipulation and distorts moral judgement

Anthony Ravlich

They have succeeded in keeping my book hidden from people . Even if I break the law they succeed in ensuring my reasons are not told to people. I would do youtube videos but they have succeeded, I believe, in ensuring for about 2 1/2 yrs I have not received in receiving my inheritance after my father’s death. They seem to have thought of everything. If I could speak to the UN General Assembly I would. While the odd person on social media is supportive they have made sure that the population has little knowledge of human rights by failing to fund section 5a of the Human Rights Act which requires that people be educated in human rights. All I can do is wait and hope an opportunity arises. The human rights estab and academia are all ideologically controlled. And yes it would be a revolution. At present I hate that countries are being deliberately kept backward by crushing the potential of people. I think we need some luck on our side. As far as I am concerned I found the human rights truth and the rest is really up to people I cannot get an AK47 and attack parliament or the UN so now I just take it much easier. It could take a third world war or nuclear war before they address the situation which I regard as dire. All the best

My tweet. Impeachment is a sham!!! Why is my book (pub early 2017 in America) still being kept hidden from Americans? I regard Democrats as a death cult and the closest to the evil that exists in the county. See my blog, https://outsiderethicalhumanrights.home.blog In addition: I regard Bernie Sanders who promotes economic, social and cultural rights as the only genuine left candidate.

Anthony Ravlich New Zealanders need to see that nearly all of our major problems stem from the UN. There is the Migration compact, Agenda 21 as well as human rights which have been grossly manipulated essentially to ensure people will not be able to think for themselves or even have a conscience of their own (see my blog https://outsiderethicalhumanrights.home.blog) so people will be unable to challenge government policies. My recent book shows the UN wants a One World Government which leads to nearly all States adopting a form of totalitarianism – nearly all will be top-down controlled, people will not have to think, simply obey. Those that promote the UN agenda i.e. neoliberalism and globalization, are a left-ing death cult which also gains the support of the Corporations and right-wing politics leading to the oppression of those outside the establishment. In my book I prove the existence of a new globally dominant ideology neoliberal absolutism which I describe as evil. It rebalance global ideological and economic power from the West to the Rest as well as being the real cause of the global financial crisis which impacted by far the worse on the European Union. Because nearly all have a computer this information can be shared to many. All my work is verifiable with sources so I very much doubt anyone can prove me wrong.

Become backward or take society forward?

To save western culture and even civilization itself intelligent males from a western culture are desperately needed to take society forward.

In his statistical analysis Charles Murray in his 2003 book Human Accomplishment showed that ‘….97% of all generally agreed major historical accomplishments in the arts and sciences are since the 14.th century made by males born in a small area of northern Europe’.

Furthermore, his book states: ‘From 800BC to 1950AD 97% of the world’s scientific advances occurred in Europe and North America. 98% of the significant figures were male’.

Those countries in the small area of northern Europe are: Scotland, England, Denmark, Germany, France and Italy.

For instance, Germany is said to be renounded for being the Country of Poets and Thinkers (das Land der Dichter und Denker) because it has contributed greatly to philosophy, music, literature and independent thought. It seems such individuals gave Germans a certain pride in their country and were regarded as heroes. For instance, there was Luther responsible for the Protestant Reformation; writers like Johann Wolfgang von Goethe (who wrote Faust) and Friedrich Schiller (who wrote Die Rauber “The Robbers”). Others were great philosophers and thinkers like:

Gottfried Wilhelm von Leibniz, who was also a mathematician and logician and who discovered calculus independently of Newton,

Immanuel Kant, the author of the monumental philosophical work Kritik der Reinen Vernunft (Critique of Pure Reason),

Arthur Schopenhauer, who wrote Die Welt als Wille und Vorstellung (The World as Will and Representation),

Friedrich Nietzsche, the scholar whose work has exerted a profound influence on modern intellectual history.

While in Music there was Ludwig van Beethoven, Johann Sebastian Bach, Richard Strauss, Felix Mendelssohn.

Similar human accomplishments can also be said for the other countries in northern Europe. I consider these accomplishments requiring freedom of thought led to the dominance of western civilization.

Whereas previously the West was favoured by the UN General Assembly in 2008 the West was marginalized in the general assembly. In my book I describe many human rights omissions by the United Nations designed to eliminate the ability of the West to achieve major accomplishments. For example, the right to individual self-determination was omitted. It permits the seeking of truth, hopes and dreams and allows an individual to reach full potential and become a master of his/her own destiny. It is sometimes depicted by the iconic American superhero.

I show how the UN determined western civilization and global freedom for decline. In my view, this would lead to countries being kept backward and unable to hold their leadership to account threatening the destruction of civilization itself.

It is the left so-called liberals, within countries, who are engaged in fulfilling the UN Agenda by promoting neoliberalism and globalization (both the latter created by the UN’s human rights omissions). In my book I show how the left so-called liberals are really a social class and therefore collectivists. I now regard them as a death cult. They assumed the moral high ground by being fanatically politically correct i.e. anti-racist and anti-sexist, yet because they discriminate on the grounds of social class their anti-racism and anti-sexism did not extend to the poor in those groups. By giving affirmative action to black, in New Zealand, Maori, and female professionals they were able to fulfil the UN Agenda by targeting intelligent, white, males from a western culture for exclusion. In my view, this resulted in the professional sector being reduced to less than mediocrity.

Many women, particularly feminists, and radical blacks/Maori, aligned themselves with the death cult and, in my view, their self-interest is so deep-set, they are also prepared to sacrifice western culture and even, as mad as it may seem, civilization itself.

In my book I show how for a person to be master of his/her own destiny requires both survival rights i.e. at least the core minimum of the rights in economic, social and cultural rights, and also self-help rights i.e. at least the core minimum of the human rights in civil and political rights.

Because both sets of rights are involved (in America civil and political rights can to some extent be equated with its constitution) the use of the term socialist is, in my view, an inappropriate term because many socialist countries lack civil and political rights. Rather because I consider that, at least, the core minimum of economic, social and cultural rights is required for individual self-determination I think an ‘enlightened welfare’ is a much more appropriate description. Such core minimums are unlikely to involve excessive State control or cost. Political parties can promote higher levels of rights if, for example, they think they can be afforded.

I became aware of the special role for males in forging new paths into the future when I, although living close to homelessness for many years, discovered ethical human rights which provides a new plan for the future of humanity. Ethical human rights are firmly based on the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and simply requires that all governments ensure for all their population, at least, all the core minimum of the human rights in the UDHR. Apart from domestic duties there are also global duties e.g. to help those countries unable to ensure ethical human rights for their people.

Ethical human rights being universal it removes the human rights omissions of the United Nations required for the creation of neoliberalism and globalization both of which aim to remove independence of thought and purge counties of intelligent, white, males from a western culture. The latter would result in a decline in global freedom, destroy western civilization and ultimately, in my view, destroy civilization itself.

The special role for males reflects their capacity for rugged individualism, independence of thought and the ability to challenge all forms of authority. It is well known that males often respond to ‘boot-camp’ like conditions. Whereas nearly all other positions in society, including that of politicians, very largely requires obedience to preserve the status quo rather than take society forward.

Ethical human rights received some remarkable support on the internet from the US State Department, the Open Democracy Initiative of the White House, even the United Nations itself as well as a number of others such as Save the Children (US), see posts/articles on my blog, https://outsiderethicalhumanrights.home.blog. However, the mainstream media refused to report the existence of ethical human rights.

My belief in ethical human rights enabled me, more by accident than design, to discover truly momentous decisions made by the United Nations. For example, the creation of a new globally dominant ideology, neoliberal absolutism, seemingly to suit a one world government which would require all countries to adhere to a form of totalitarianism which aimed to eliminate independence of thought. Neoliberal absolutism resulted in a major rebalance of ideological and economic power from the West to the Rest as well as, in my view, being the real cause of the global financial crisis 2008 which impacted by far the worse on the European Union. Again, the mainstream media refused to report these truly momentous decisions of the UN however my work is verifiable with sources.

To become backward or take society forward is a matter of choice for people to make.

Further support in the establishment for ethical human rights. Shulamith Koenig is the founder of PDHR, People’s Movement for Human Rights Learning. She was a recipient of the 2003 UN prize in the field of human rights. Previous recipients of the award include Eleanor Roosevelt, Martin Luther King, Nelson Mandela and Jimmy Carter. Shulamith Koenig described my recent article as ‘awesome’ (see ‘People were told to follow the money but I followed the truth’, Ireland Indymedia, 3 Nov. http://www.indymedia.ie/article/107261). The following is my most recent discussion with her on linkedin (16 Nov 2019).
anthony ravlich 2:22 AM Thanks, sorry you have not been well but I did not expect a further response. I myself am still recovering after my last book published in early 2017. I very strongly believe I found the human rights truth- it is many human rights omissions at the UN which sets humanity on a self-destructive course but it was met with an overwhelming silence. I now realize I am dealing with a death cult. I believe saving civilization to be of profound importance at the level of the soul and God and still hope it can be saved. All the best
Shulamith Koenig 3:23 AM Will write back soon .I agree with every word you say!!
In conclusion: in my opinion there are those in the establishment who are not transparent and realize they are deceiving the people. If people do not stand up to them, in my view, they will not respect you – they will walk all over you.

The Death Cult and Fake Human Rights. Meetings: I am a human rights author (two books), activist and outsider (27 years) from Auckland, New Zealand. I will be holding my next meeting on Thursday 28 November at 4.30pm (see below) and all are welcome.

The Human Rights Council (New Zealand) which was created in 2001 has held regular meetings since so when you feel able to face this human rights truth you can come to any meeting. Membership is not required.

On the 28 Nov I will discuss why I liken the left so-called liberals to a death cult and how the prohibition of social class discrimination will greatly diminish their influence.

My recent book (see below) shows that many of the problems being faced can be described by human rights e.g. human rights violations and the cause of the problems are nearly always human rights omissions while the solution is to include the omitted human rights.

The left so-called liberals are a social class within the NZ Labour Party which I show discriminates on the grounds of social class. The NZ Human Rights Commission has considered recommending the prohibition of social class discrimination.

The left so-called liberals also promote the fake human rights of the United Nations commonly understood as neoliberalism and globalization which strongly favours the establishment and oppresses the rest. They are fake because many human rights in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights are omitted in the interests of global leaderships who I show want backward populations unable to hold leadership to account.

In my view, New Zealanders need to understand that the fake liberals pose the major threat to New Zealand although right wing politics benefit considerably from their promotion of neoliberalism and globalization. In my opinion, because of the class loyalty of the fake liberals they are prepared to sacrifice western culture and even sacrifice civilization itself.

In my book I describe truly momentous decisions made by the UN but not reported by the fake global media. I describe the creation of an ‘evil’ globally dominant ideology, neoliberal absolutism, ostensibly for a one world government. Neoliberal absolutism determines the decline of western civilization as well as creating the Global Financial Crisis 2008 with the EU by far the worst affected. In my view, the GFC is ongoing so another recession in the EU certainly seems likely. I show how the UN contrary to the purpose of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) have determined the rise in totalitarianism, repressive States and tribalism.

That global academia refuses to discuss my research findings e.g. that the UN created the GFC, shows they are subjected to ideological capture.

I have had unbelievable difficulty in promoting my recent book (see below) because it is obviously regarded as very dangerous by the left so-called liberals who seem to have an enormous grip on New Zealand society as well as globally because similar classes exist in numerous countries. In my view, my book is considered very dangerous because after 26 years of research I strongly believe I found the human rights truth and it is not on the side of the left so-called liberals.

I consider that consequently they will oppose the seeking of truth and freedom of speech at every turn. And that they are now banning many guns is not surprising because the truth will surely become far better known.

A much better NZ and world is far more possible than nearly all people realize. In my view, it requires a human rights focus which my recent book shows is virtually all that is necessary to understand the worse that is happening. My book shows that it is human rights which controls the money. And my book released in 2017 has not been challenged and I very much doubt it could be successfully.

At present people’s minds are distracted by numerous explanations for our problems. For example, you tube provides numerous causes such as the one per cent, the corporations, the banks, religions, right or left-wing politics, communism, socialism, fascism, white supremacists, totalitarianism, tribalism, the illuminati, even climate change and alien beings etc etc.

Since I began promoting human rights in 1991, unlike the establishment, I have exercised a duty to inform people of important human truths which reflects the duty to the community in the UDHR (Article 29(1)). In my view, all should have duties to the community according to their capacity. For example, nearly all have computers so can spread ideas to enable people to see through the left so-called liberals and vote accordingly.

I devised ethical human rights which is a more realistic dream than the UDHR and can be ensured by nearly all States. Ethical human rights simply require that all States ensure their population with, at least, all the core minimums of the human rights in the UDHR (the UN Committee on Economic, social and cultural rights have devised many of the core minimums for economic social and cultural rights).

While ethical human rights are universal i.e. applies to all countries, within countries political parties can offer higher levels of human rights according to the country’s capacity e.g. if they can be afforded. But what is so very important about ethical human rights is that it includes all the omitted human rights required to create neoliberalism and globalization so would replace the latter and eliminate the unfairness that presently exists i.e. the establishment’s oppression of the rest of the country.

If you can understand my recent article you should have no trouble understanding what I have to say, see ‘People were told to follow the money but I followed the truth’, Ireland Indymedia, 3 Nov. http://www.indymedia.ie/article/107261

The article was described by Shulamith Koenig as ‘awesome’ (10 Nov). Shulamith Koenig is the Founder of PDHR, People’s Movement for Human Rights Learning and recipient of the 2003 UN Prize in the field of human rights.

My major support (virtually my only support) in the establishment is Kevin McCormack, the Secretary of New Zealand Civil Liberties, and formerly Assistant Secretary of Commercial Affairs. He read the article and subsequent posts describing the UN agenda followed by States to eliminate genius. He stated:

“I think that, fortunately, genius will always find a way to flourish, although the downside js that there will be far fewer occasions when that occurs” (7 Nov).

I responded: “I think the fake liberals are a death cult. I choose life and I think they are not self-honest” (9 Nov).

Other articles/posts can be found on my blog, https://outsiderethicalhumanrights.home.blog/.

Meetings will be held at my address, 10D, 15 City Rd., Auckland City, dial 0103 then push alarm. I will  wait downstairs at 4.30pm in case the intercom system does not work.

My home phone is (09) 9409658, mobile 022 6986063.

It took 2 ½ years but my book has finally been accepted by NZ libraries. ‘Ethical Human Rights: Freedom’s Great Hope’ (American Academic Press, 2017), is sold by Google Books and Amazon, https://www.amazon.com/Ethical-Human-Rights-ANTHONY-RAVLICH/dp/B01N0Y3TAN .

Because of the decisions made at the UN (and reflected in national constitutions, in New Zealand, the bill of rights act 1990) you and your children will not be able to follow your passions, your dreams or doing what you love leaving largely only the money to follow i.e. no genius will be permitted. What distinguishes Western culture from other cultures and led to the dominance of western civilization will be removed. All populations will be kept backward. Read my previous post, ‘People were told to follow the money but I followed the truth’. I describe how the UN plan is to eliminate the independence of thought i.e.only obedience will be required under a one-world government.The following is what people are being advised on one page of the internet:
Follow the Money (And Not Your Passion) – Factor This!
For most people, telling them to “follow their passion” is neither useful nor …
A Brutal Truth About Following Your Passion and Doing What …
Aug 3, 2017 – A Brutal Truth About Following Your Passion and Doing What You Love That …
‘Following Your Passion’ Is Dead – Here’s What To Replace It …
Jul 5, 2018 – question – have you ever told them “Just follow your passion”? … Why You Should Follow The Money (And Not Your Passion)https://www.thebalance.com › Personal Finance › Budgeting › Finance Tips
We are often told to follow our dreams but what if our passions don’t pay the bills or … says the suggestion that money doesn’t
Jun 22, 2018 – Mantras like these can cause people to give up and miss out on new interests. … If your college graduation speaker told you to “follow your passion,” …
Billionaire Mark Cuban says don’t follow your passionhttps://www.cnbc.com › 2017/09/20 › billionaire-mark-cuban-says-dont-f…
Why “Follow Your Passion” is Pretty Bad Advice – The Musehttps://www.themuse.com › advice › why-follow-your-passion-is-pretty-ba…
The Problem with “Follow Your Dreams” | Psychology Todayhttps://www.psychologytoday.com › blog › test-case › the-problem-follow…