My post on a German website: As I have said before the science must be trusted. It must be based on universal human rights truth (for all) which reflects the soul not ideology. If it is based on the latter elites are strongly privileged. Ideology ensures that people are unable to think for themselves which suits those elites obsessed with control. I have written a significant section on climate change in my book. Academics refuse to discuss the subject with me but surely it is not unreasonable to demand that the science is conducted properly after all we are discussing the future of the planet.

The importance of understanding human rights which is the language of the elites. However, I was called into the office of the manager of the Human Rights Commission and informed that although Section 5(a) of the Human Rights Act 1993 requires the Commission to educate people in human rights successive governments since 1993 have refused to fund it. Universal human rights truth as in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights equates with the Golden Rule – ‘do unto others as you would have them do unto you’ – which all the major religions espouse (described in much detail in the chapter in my book on Bangladesh). Also, I believe that universal truth reflects the nature of the soul. My book describes the Gross Human rights Malpractice of the United Nations which has omitted a number of human rights designed to keep their populations backward and unable to hold leadership to account. I call the omissions the creative rights which led to the dominance of western civilization. I regard the human rights omissions to be a gross crime against humanity but many of these populations rather than blaming their leadership instead blame the West e.g Colonisation. All States (including America) seem to retain a strict loyalty to the United Nations and refuse to expose its gross human rights malpractice. But as an outsider, I have no such loyalty to the UN although I am very loyal to the universal human rights truth as in the Universal Declaration. Although described in much detail in my book (it is verifiable with sources) States as well as the global mainstream media will not inform people that on the 10 December 2008 the UN created a new globally dominant ideology which I call Neoliberal Absolutism which because of my long experience of a form of totalitarianism I considered people would not be able to think for themselves or even have a conscience of their own. I regard the latter as ‘evil’. Neoliberal absolutism rebalanced ideological and economic power from the West to the Rest. America was the major opposition to Neoliberal Absolutism during the discussions at the UN from 2004 to 2008. Unlike in the past America and the American camp e.g. Canada, Britain, Australia and Japan (New Zealand seemed to sit on the fence) have been marginalized in the UN General Assembly. The UN now promotes the decline of western civilization because what freedoms remain in the latter hinder the UN’s promotion of totalitarianism, repressive States, political Islam, and tribalism. Not told humanity is that Neoliberal Absolutism because it permits exploitation was, in my view, the real cause of the Global Financial Crisis 2008 with the European Union by far the worse affected. The human rights omissions (and therefore the creation of Neoliberal Absolutism) are a decision of the great majority of States at the UN and seem invariably reflected in national constitutions (in NZ in the bill of rights) and are driven by a social class who I call fake liberals (within the US democrats and the NZ labor party). The UN’s agenda (ideology including globalization) benefit both left and right politics called the swamp in America. As an outsider and because of my belief in universal human rights truth as in the Universal Declaration (which I believe reflects the soul which belongs to God) to my knowledge, I am the only person in the world informing you of the UN’s Gross Human Rights Malpractice. In America I consider Bernie Sanders because of his promotion of economic, social and political rights is in the best position to inform the world of the UN’s Gross Human Rights Malpractice important if the Corporations are not to be considerably highly favored by being able to relocate to countries with cheap labor without fear of exploitation being prohibited.I promote ethical human rights which simply requires that all should have, at least, the core minimum of all the rights in the Universal Declaration. A great country ensures ethical human rights for its people and a great world is where all countries do likewise. Higher levels of human rights can be aspired to. The core minimum of economic, social and cultural rights have been very largely determined by the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. I consider the UN’s (and EU’s) human rights role should be limited to hold States to account for violations of the core minimums which protect people from extreme violence and extreme poverty. States are then left with considerable sovereignty to determine higher levels of human rights.My book (in NZ libraries) is, Ethical Human Rights: Freedom’s Great Hope (American Academic Press, 2017), https://www.amazon.com/Ethical-Human-Rights-ANTHONY-RAVLICH/dp/B01N0Y3TAN

Trump is not being racist he is simply defending western culture – that many who adhere to that culture happen to be white is simply coincidental. Anyone can adopt western culture. Trump’s major opposition come from those who adhere to the UN’s One World Government agenda e.g. it seeks open border, which my book shows aims to destroy western civilization whose freedom (at least what is left of it) stands in the way of the UN’s promotion of totalitarian, Repressive States, political Islam and tribalism. Anyone who reads my book will see that given the lies and gross deceit of the UN that it could not be trusted to preside over a One World Government. Yet if you oppose the UN’s agenda which aims to destroy western culture you are called racist.
PS. I promote ethical human rights which extend western culture to include economic, social and cultural rights e.g. the individual rights to employment, health, housing education etc. Ensuring, at least, the core minimum of that latter rights provides a socio-economic bottom-line which protects against exploitation.

My comment re my recent post on Armageddon: It’s not a conspiracy theory. From a human rights perspective, it’s quite simple: human rights are meant to be for all i.e. universal. But what happens is that elites manipulate human rights in their interests as my many posts on this site shows. But eventually, life gets so bad for the majority that change becomes inevitable so we must return ‘home’ to the universal which I also believe reflects the nature of the soul. I consider universal truth is more important than the material world. It’s the sword of truth. Armageddon – 2019-2026, The War within, is happening, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bSECB7vtF_o&feature=share

I have written two books on ethical human rights – a new plan for humanity which is firmly based on the universal human rights truth as in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. It would eliminate ideology which has strongly favored elites and oppressed the masses.

Removing the sword of truth. Further to my previous post where I describe that from a human rights perspective the major purpose of the dominant elites in New Zealand was to severely dumb down society. This was achieved to a large extent using affirmative action which is permitted by the NZ bill of rights. For example by giving affirmative action to female and Maori professionals it allowed the best and brightest to be overlooked. Because of the latter very many of the best and brightest left the country while many who did not leave ended up in the mental health and criminal justice systems. Removing the best and brightest is like removing the sword of truth. However, in my view, affirmative action was wrongly directed because those who had suffered most from historical discrimination were women and Maori low on the social scale not professionals. In my book I describe making a stand on principle and appearing in the Auckland High Court where I describe what I called a New Zealand tragedy with many New Zealanders pushed down the social scale a consequence of social class discrimination. It created a large underclass and, in my view, many ended up in the mental health and criminal justice systems. Justice Lynn Stevens believed my account and asked me why I had not informed New Zealand earlier although he was aware I was one of those severely suppressed and that my anger took a long time to overcome to the point where I could properly describe what had happened. I was convinced that no one was meant to survive with their sanity intact and able to articulate had happened. Even though the mainstream news media were present at the court appearance they did not report ‘the NZ tragedy’ and it was not reported in the mainstream media.

It helps when you understand what it is all about from a human rights perspective. What my last book very clearly shows it is about the dumbing down of society to ensure the truth is rarely ever heard. In my view, the latter is why freedom of speech is being suppressed. For example, about one million New Zealanders (out of a population of 4.5 million) fled the country. It included many of our best and brightest. My book shows that often those who did not leave ended up in the mental health and criminal justice systems.
The dumbing down is caused by human rights omissions which seek to eliminate the independence of thought, including genius, and so ensure obedience to the status quo.
The human rights omissions in the NZ bill of rights reflects a UN Agenda which seeks to eliminate global freedom, including western civilization. New Zealand has been one of the UN’s most obedient servants. For example, Helen Clark was head of the United Nations Development Project for two terms. 
It is sometimes said that the right to freedom of expression in the bill of rights ensures freedom of speech but what is not realized is that the fake liberals, who control the mainstream media, discriminate on the grounds of social class so can exclude any views from outside the establishment which challenges the status quo. 
The latter has certainly been my experience in 27 years of promoting human rights and the mainstream media will still not publish any of my articles even though I have had two books published. It took 2 1/2 yrs before my last book was accepted by New Zealand libraries.
I consider New Zealanders need to decide whether they want an intelligent society or a stupid society. To achieve the former New Zealanders need to recognize the enormous importance of universal truth (which, in my view, reflects the soul). Any human rights omissions is a perversion of universal human rights truth which results in an ideology which invariably strongly favors elites and oppresses the masses.
My blog is https://outsider.ethicalhumanrights.home.blog.

Posted on Bernie Sanders Activists: Why would it matter how far left/progressive you are as long as (1) you retain your individual freedoms e.g. free speech, (2) you can afford it e.g. free health care, free university tuition. With respect to the latter it would seem that taxing the rich would be the answer but my book shows that the corporations are in a very powerful position. On 10 December 2008 the United Nations permitted exploitation which meant that the Corporations could relocate to countries with cheap labor without fear of exploitation being prohibited. I consider the latter was the real cause of the Global Financial Crisis in 2008. To attract the Corporations and jobs back to America greater taxes on the rich could not be an option. The UN needs to be exposed for wrongfully permitting exploitation. The global mainstream media refused to report it but it is described in my book, ‘Ethical Human Rights: Freedom’s Great Hope’ (American Academic Press 2017). As an outsider I am not ideologically captured unlike those in the establishment. It took 2 1/2 years for my book to be accepted by New Zealand libraries. How long is it likely to take American libraries to accept it? It may be possible for Americans to get it on interloan. There was an Ebook on Google Books but it has mysteriously disappeared. However, it may still be selling on Amazon, https://www.amazon.com/Ethical-Human-Rights-ANTHONY-RAVLICH/dp/B01N0Y3TAN/ref=sr_1_1?keywords=anthony+ravlich&qid=1560894554&s=books&sr=1-1

At last!!! My book, Ethical Human Rights: Freedom’s Great Hope (American Academic Press, 2017) has finally been accepted by New Zealand libraries after 18 months since publications thanks to the perseverance of a mate of mine who actually bought the book for them. Also, I now have my passport although about 6 weeks overdue. Anyone with any questions about my book can phone me (ph: (0064) (09) 9409658). My phone now appears to be working after over 2 years when few were able to ring me. I suspect there is an unwritten policy which requires people to fight for everything and given that many outside the establishment are already struggling and are tired of fighting and just accept the status quo no matter how unjust. In that way, the State ensures a docile obedient population. I now have an understanding of why so few had the courage to speak out in my 27 years of a human rights writer and activist.

My post on All News from New Zealand: Anthony Ravlich Climate change – I need to be convinced that science is not ideologically controlled. If it is ideology rather than universal human rights truth (for all) then elites are very strongly favored. The science needs to be trusted.

My post on the Association of Sovereignz replying to a question where could my book be bought: Where can we get your full book? It doesn’t seem available to buy on google books.
Anthony Ravlich I see that Jordan Peterson’s book has been banned by the New Zealand Distributor post the terrorism in Christchurch. While libraries around the world have suppressed my book it was selling on Google Books and Amazon. Now it seems it is not. I have been in contact with my publisher and hoping for a reply if they have not been ‘got at”. I consider the book is of enormous importance to humanity as it explains what is really going on in the world corrupted by a UN Agenda. You will be amazed at the chapter on NZ where I describe the low cunning and gross deceit of Geoffrey Palmer and Helen Clark and, in my view, prove it conclusively. NZ was dumbed down enormously ensuring that there would be little challenge to government policies. I will let you know where you can get a copy of the books. You give me hope. I suspect my book has been completely banned. Also my passport is 5 weeks overdue (see my post below where I describe my plan to travel to Europe and Bangladesh).