Posted on Schizophrenia Support Group: My friend has been in the mental health establishment for many years and keeps asking me to tell her the truth. The following is my latest effort and I thought it might help others. It is a human rights perspective: “

I am telling you the truth but you do not seem to understand what I am telling you. Just take the omissions of children’s rights and family rights in the bill of rights and then see child poverty and also domestic violence. Now I am telling you that the rights e.g. the right to individual self-determination, which help you better yourself have been omitted so over a million NZers (brains and brawn) left the country because no matter how good they were they were being overlooked. Of course government will not tell you about the omitted human rights so you are left in a state of confusion because you do not see what has been done. The bureaucrats implement the bill of rights but this is done behind closed doors so you cannot see the real cause of your misery e.g. they overlooked the rights of the children and see what happened to them. Please tell me if this helps you – I need to know”.

Soon I plan to travel to Europe to research White Supremacy which has some relevance to New Zealand given the recent terrorist attack at two Mosques in Christchurch by a White Supremacist. My suppressed book explains how intelligent, white males from western culture and no doubt including White Supremacists are being targeted for exclusion by a UN Agenda whose One World Government plan seeks the decline of global freedom including western civilization.I am very confident I can convince the White Supremacists that they are mistaken in blaming other minorities such as Muslims, Jews, or even Asians or Maori in New Zealand, rather they should be targeting their governments who are captured by the UN Agenda.I have been in contact with my publisher, American Academic Press, who has asked me to send the full manuscript for review when I have finished. However, given that my last book has been suppressed I am not sure whether I will write another. I may just inform the public using youtube videos.Also, I have been invited to go to Bangladesh by Dalit Rights Activist and lawyer Narayan Charmakar who also believes in the ethical human rights I promote. He wants to give classes in ethical human rights. It was at his request I wrote a chapter in my book on Bangladesh where I gained an understanding of Islamic terrorism. In my book, I describe how a major cause of the Islamic terrorism experienced in Bangladesh stems from decisions made at the United Nations. I also show how terrorists could pursue a peaceful jihad rather than a violent jihad by gaining a greater voice in the mainstream.I would have provided classes in New Zealand on ethical human rights, which is firmly based on universal human rights truth as in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, but exceeding few New Zealanders see the importance of universality and consequently how human rights omissions within the UN Agenda (reflected in the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990) have had such a devastating effect on society. In my view, more New Zealanders need to get in touch with their spiritual being which reflects universal truth rather than wealth and power. I consider New Zealanders need to see that all their political parties in parliament are captured by the UN Agenda and that only an outsider based on universal truth i.e. for all, can help them. But the latter is likely to take some time. Meanwhile, I will continue to go my own way.

My post on the Association for Sovereignz: Enormous patience on the part of Donald Trump but now the Democrats are being investigated. My suppressed book (because the fake liberals still have enormous control) shows that if the truth is followed to the bitter end it will be found that the Democrats (and fake liberals in NZ) are based on a perversion of the Universal Declaration (creating divided societies and the demise of western civilization). In other words, the truth is not on their side so they will keep opposing the seeking of truth to the bitter end but they WILL lose (see my blog, https://outsiderethicalhumanrights.home.blog).
Posted on the Association for Sovereignz: Anthony Ravlich Sean Thomas I give examples in my book (which has been suppressed by libraries) in America, New Zealand and Bangladesh of the suppression of entrepreneurship. The relationship between the latter and the corporations is not direct. Rather it is the UN Agenda (neoliberalism and globalization) which suppresses entrepreneurship. The UN Agenda is reflected in nearly all constitutions (in NZ the bill of rights) and is driven by the fake liberals on the left but no doubt the corporations appreciate the greater privileges bestowed on them as well as having less competition from new businesses. What it is all about is destroying the capacity of individuals to think for themselves. It is in the interests of the fake liberals to create sick people – generally speaking, while the fake liberals on the left want your soul the right-wing want your money. In my view, it is this capacity to think for oneself which led to the dominance of western civilization and the lack of this capacity which led to the backwardness of many other cultures. The person who thinks for themselves, the seeker of truth, the genius, in particular, is, in my view, the most hated individual in society because he/she exposes the truth e.g. the cause of the problems. In today’s world, my book shows that it is in the interests of the considerable number of States who meet in the UN General Assembly to ensure their populations do not think for themselves so they kept backward and unable to hold leaders to account. It takes great courage to think for oneself so the dominance of western civilization has been in my view largely deserved. But few people have such courage and prefer obedience often even to that which is ‘evil’. The latter I consider to be the case in today’s world but there is hope on the horizon as evidenced by the rise of nationalism to protect western culture.

It must be becoming apparent by now how ridiculous political correctness is. Surely it is what a person has in their head that counts not their color of skin, gender or whether gay or straight. In my view, it is just something growing up teaches you as does human rights properly interpreted. My suppressed book shows that the Democrats has been following a UN Agenda based on a perversion of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights which has determined western civilization for a decline. The fake liberals (within Democrats in US, within Labor Party in NZ) together with feminists, in particular, and radical blacks have targeted the dominant group in western civilization i.e. intelligent, white males from a western culture for exclusion (and I show that many of whom ended up in the mental health and criminal justice systems) in order to fulfill the UN Agenda.

I have written many posts describing how numerous States are captured by a UN Agenda which is based on a perversion of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (which the UN claims as its authority). My suppressed book shows that the UN Agenda has determined western civilization for a decline and recommends western countries boycott the UN.
Another approach seems also possible. 
Today I received an email from the Peace Movement Aotearoa which shows how States can put pressure on the UN to correct its gross human rights malpractice by making late payments. The email stated: “Urgent action: UN HR [human rights] sessions under threat
Six of the ten UN human rights treaty monitoring bodies are very likely to have sessions in 2019 canceled for financial reasons – an unprecedented consequence of overdue payments by some UN member states (not NZ we are pleased to say)”.
https://www.ohchr.org/Doc…/Publications/AnnualAppeal2019.pdf )
My post on the Association for Sovereignz: Enormous patience on the part of Donald Trump but now the Democrats are being investigated. My suppressed book (because the fake liberals still have enormous control) shows that if the truth is followed to the bitter end it will be found that the Democrats (and fake liberals in NZ) are based on a perversion of the Universal Declaration (creating divided societies and the demise of western civilization). In other words the truth is not on their side so they will keep opposing the seeking of truth to the bitter end but they WILL lose (see my blog, https://outsiderethicalhumanrights.home.blog).

My post on the Association for Sovereignz: Anthony Ravlich What I am saying is not rocket science. Anyone of reasonable intellect should understand it. Human rights are meant to be universal i.e. for everyone. However, the UN has left out a number of human rights (and virtual all States dutifully follow) to strongly favor the Corporations i.e. the global free market is strongly preferred to the domestic free market which means that capitalism has been grossly distorted. In the past entrepreneurship was able to forge new paths into the future but because of the omissions of the creative rights e.g. individual self-determination such as the seeking of truth, hopes, and dreams (sometimes depicted by the iconic American superhero) it has resulted in low GDP growth while the global free market has meant Corporations have relocated to countries where they can exploit cheap labor. While I am not a great proponent of capitalism it is not been judged fairly when it has been deliberately distorted. Suffice to say if it was not for the manipulation of human rights there seems little evidence to suggest that capitalism is broken – so apart from including the omitted human rights it does not seem to need fixing or eliminating. The ethical human right I promote emphasizes small/medium business rather than the Corporations so may be a considerable benefit to climate change as well as protecting the habitat of the wildlife. I certainly think it is enormously arrogant of humanity to think that we are justified in destroying so much of the animal kingdom. I believe both humans and animals have a divine right to be here.

Anthony RavlichJulie Egan My book is suppressed by libraries around the world. although it is selling on Google Books and Amazon. I have constantly informed people since early 2017 that my second book exposes the human rights truth and describes the gross human rights malpractice of the UN and States, New Zealand and Bangladesh, which explains many of the problems we face such as the huge gap between rich and poor and how intelligent, white males from a western culture are being targeted for exclusion to fulfill the UN’s Agenda which has determined western civilization for decline. I am at an age where I have had most of my life but people because they do not sufficiently care about the truth are leaving a terrible legacy for the young to resolve. People are living off future generations which I consider is incredibly selfish. Because people are so selfish they are leaving the world in great jeopardy because the morally corrupt UN is promoting the rise of totalitarian and repressive States which is what occurred prior to the second world war ending with nuclear warfare. I have had to come to terms with the latter scenario – not very successfully because I would find it so sad to see such devastation inflicted on humanity. In my view, because people care so little for the truth they must take much responsibility for whatever happens. Nowadays, I hope for a miracle. I think people should get in touch with their spiritual being which I consider reflects universal truth, not wealth and power..Don’t feel sorry for me Julie – I can cope – feel sorry for the young.

Posted on the Association for Sovereignz: Anthony Ravlich Sean Thomas I give examples in my book (which has been suppressed by libraries) in America, New Zealand and Bangladesh of the suppression of entrepreneurship. The relationship between the latter and the corporations is not direct. Rather it is the UN Agenda (neoliberalism and globalization) which suppresses entrepreneurship. The UN Agenda is reflected in nearly all constitutions (in NZ the bill of rights) and is driven by the fake liberals on the left but no doubt the corporations appreciate the greater privileges bestowed on them as well as having less competition from new businesses. What it is all about is destroying the capacity of individuals to think for themselves. It is in the interests of the fake liberals to create sick people – generally speaking, while the fake liberals on the left want your soul the right-wing want your money. In my view, it is this capacity to think for oneself which led to the dominance of western civilization and the lack of this capacity which led to the backwardness of many other cultures. The person who thinks for themselves, the seeker of truth, the genius, in particular, is, in my view, the most hated individual in society because he/she exposes the truth e.g. the cause of the problems. In today’s world, my book shows that it is in the interests of the considerable number of States who meet in the UN General Assembly to ensure their populations do not think for themselves so they kept backward and unable to hold leaders to account. It takes great courage to think for oneself so the dominance of western civilization has been in my view largely deserved. But few people have such courage and prefer obedience often even to that which is ‘evil’. The latter I consider to be the case in today’s world but there is hope on the horizon as evidenced by the rise of nationalism to protect western culture.

Further comment on the Association for Sovereignz: Anthony Ravlich Nick Sturges Again you are quite right- the UN has a one world government agenda and is promoting totalitarian and repressive States including political Islam which suit the extreme top-down control (a form of totalitarianism) they have determined for us. They have also determined the decline in global freedom, including western civilization which stands in the way of their OWG agenda. My problem is that I am before my time. There are things that have happened and been decided upon which are being deliberately withheld from humanity. This is only a guess (and I could well be wrong) but I think they may be waiting for the right time to inform people. I only hope it is not too late because enormous damage is being done in the meantime. Also the rise of totalitarianism occurred prior to the 2nd world war which ended with nuclear explosions in Japan.

My post on the Association for Sovereignz: Anthony Ravlich What I am saying is not rocket science. Anyone of reasonable intellect should understand it. Human rights are meant to be universal i.e. for everyone. However, the UN has left out a number of human rights (and virtual all States dutifully follow) to strongly favor the Corporations i.e. the global free market is strongly preferred to the domestic free market which means that capitalism has been grossly distorted. In the past entrepreneurship was able to forge new paths into the future but because of the omissions of the creative rights e.g. individual self-determination such as the seeking of truth, hopes, and dreams (sometimes depicted by the iconic American superhero) it has resulted in low GDP growth while the global free market has meant Corporations have relocated to countries where they can exploit cheap labor. While I am not a great proponent of capitalism it is not been judged fairly when it has been deliberately distorted. Suffice to say if it was not for the manipulation of human rights there seems little evidence to suggest that capitalism is broken – so apart from including the omitted human rights it does not seem to need fixing or eliminating. The ethical human right I promote emphasizes small/medium business rather than the Corporations so may be a considerable benefit to climate change as well as protecting the habitat of the wildlife. I certainly think it is enormously arrogant of humanity to think that we are justified in destroying so much of the animal kingdom. I believe both humans and animals have a divine right to be here.

My comment on the Association for Sovereignz: Anthony Ravlich I agree with you, in fact, there is no country in the world which will accept the ethical human rights I promote. Because I have been based on universal human rights truth and have been an outsider I have answers to many of the problems people face. But I have to wait for the rare exception because the establishment is ideologically controlled and ordinary people have been severely dumbed down so much so they are even very afraid to ask me questions. In my view, the human rights truth has been found and just taking Muslims as an example they are very largely blaming the wrong people – it is their governments, as well as considerable others, who have decided to exclude the creative rights which I consider led to the dominance of western civilization. If Muslims were sufficiently enlightened they would demand that their leadership includes the creative rights e.g. individual self-determination, so they do not end up with backward societies which they have to flee. Governments exclude the creative rights to keep their populations backward and unable to hold leaders to account. If you want to know more just ask me.
My comment on the Association of Sovereignz: Anthony Ravlich Nick Sturges I think my position is similar to Voltaire’s. In my vew, people have a right to what they believe in even if I consider it to be evil. As far as religion is concerned it is not my expertise and prefer to leave it to the experts to debate. However, [I believe] spirituality/God has played a part in the ethical human rights I promote so I think I have something to offer there. I have no wish to read the Koran and I have read little of the Bible. For example, in my view the neoliberal absolutism created by the UN on 10 Dec 2008 is evil however the considerable majority of States who created it has a right to their belief however they have no right to claim the UDHR as their authority when they have left out so many human rights.
Jihad can be seen as the exercise of duty and in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, there are also duties to the community but has, in my view, been wrongfully excluded in international human rights law. The ethical human rights I promote is firmly based on the UDHR and, unlike ideology e.g. neoliberalism and globalization, has no human rights omissions so would replace both neoliberalism and globalization. I consider and it is described in full in my chapter on Bangladesh in my suppressed book, that it would permit a peaceful rather than a violent jihad particularly in democracies. What is to stop religions setting up a political party based on ethical human rights and exercise a peaceful jihad by gaining a greater voice in the mainstream? Because ethical human rights are firmly based on universal human rights truth the latter can be seen as reflective of God’s/Allah’s absolute universal truth. Supporting the latter, universal human rights truth, in my view, equates with the Golden Rule i.e. do unto others as you would have them do unto you, which all the major religions agree with.The refusal of the global establishment to discuss ethical human rights, in my view, is because it would replace neoliberalism and globalization which strongly favors the establishment over the rest of the population. I consider ethical human rights would be fair on the whole population and remove the divisions including the huge gap between rich and poor.

Jihad can be seen as the exercise of duty and in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, there are also duties to the community but has, in my view, been wrongfully excluded in international human rights law. 
The ethical human rights I promote is firmly based on the UDHR and, unlike ideology e.g. neoliberalism and globalization, has no human rights omissions so would replace both neoliberalism and globalization. I consider and it is described in full in my chapter on Bangladesh in my suppressed book, that it would permit a peaceful rather than a violent jihad particularly in democracies. What is to stop religions setting up a political party based on ethical human rights and exercise a peaceful jihad by gaining a greater voice in the mainstream?
Because ethical human rights are firmly based on universal human rights truth the latter can be seen as reflective of God’s/Allah’s absolute universal truth. Supporting the latter, universal human rights truth, in my view, equates with the Golden Rule i.e. do unto others as you would have them do unto you, which all the major religions agree with.
The refusal of the global establishment to discuss ethical human rights, in my view, is because it would replace neoliberalism and globalization which strongly favors the establishment over the rest of the population. I consider ethical human rights would be fair on the whole population and remove the divisions including the huge gap between rich and poor.

My comments on the Association for Sovereignz: Julie Egan What does your book cover Anthony Ravlich?
Anthony Ravlich See list of contents in my suppressed book. In brief it describes the gross human rights malpractice of the UN and States, New Zealand and Bangladesh. It shows how global freedom, including western civilization, has been determined for decline. How the UN wants a One World Government and how intelligent, white males from a western culture are targeted for exclusion and much more considered controversial. In my view, my book has been suppressed because I actually found the human rights truth which spells the end of the domestic dominance of the fake liberals. It is a very hard truth which people may prefer to overlook depending on how much they are concerned for the future of their children.‘Ethical Human Rights: Freedom’s Great Hope’ (American Academic Press, 2017). Ebook link provided by my publishers: https://books.google.com/books?id=Z3nYDQAAQBAJ…
If the link is not accessible it can be found on my blog, https://outsiderethicalhumanrights.home.blog
Anthony Ravlich I should add because I find it so truly appalling that the great majority of States at the UN using human rights omissions have determined to keep their populations backward and virtually unable to hold leaders to account. Just think of all those poor black kids in Africa while being fed having their potential severely crushed. That is the aim of the great majority of States to crush human potential often I strongly suspect under the guise of protecting society against terrorism. The UN’s human rights omissions are often reflected in national constitutions (In NZ the bill of rights) while the UN Agenda is driven by the fake liberals for the benefit of their class and many Corporations. They have essentially determined humanity and the planet for decline. Whether they are able to get away with this utter obscenity very much depends on whether people wake up and speak out. In my view, they have no right to determine the end of humanity. They are not God!!! I once wrote to Rosslyn Noonan, former NZ Human Rights Commissioner, that I considered that if it was not for human rights I think such leaders do not deserve a life on this planet. People can easily share my posts if they agree with me especially my research findings which are verifiable and with sources.

My comment on the Association for Sovereignz: There is a joke regarding NZ’s membership of the five eyes that is: there are four eyes and a wink i.e.NZ. My suppressed book describes that of the anglo countries NZ is the most likely to become totalitarian which simply means people will be virtually totally obedient and be unable to think for themselves.
[According to Wikipedia: The Five Eyes, often abbreviated as FVEY, is an anglophone intelligence alliance comprising Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom and the United States].

Discussion on the Association of Sovereignz: Gerry Cardinalli Can I ask… who suppressed this book and for what reason?

Anthony Ravlich It has been suppressed by libraries around the world. I have asked NZ libraries for a reason but no reason is given except to say it is the decision of individual libraries. Also, the university library and law school library will not accept it. Both Kevin MCCormack, civil liberties, and Bryan Gould, regarded as one of New Zealands top intellectuals consider my book should not have been suppressed but generally people do not seem to care. I had no trouble with my first book. My suppressed book exposes the gross human rights malpractice of the UN and States, New Zealand and Bangladesh. It exposes the human rights truth which means it exposes the cause of so very many of our problems and also what needs to be done to correct the problems i.e. include the omitted human rights. Why people do not want to save humanity/planet from a self-destructive course is a never-ending major concern of mine.

I think it best to regard Jesus Christ and Muhammed as messengers not as perfect because surely only God/Allah is perfect.

Universality. I consider a new – universal – way of thinking is necessary to save global freedom including western civilization, contains a number of previous posts, http://www.indymedia.org.nz/articles/24591

Discussion on the Association of Sovereignz: Gerry Cardinalli Can I ask… who suppressed this book and for what reason?

Anthony Ravlich It has been suppressed by libraries around the world. I have asked NZ libraries for a reason but no reason is given except to say it is the decision of individual libraries. Also, the university library and law school library will not accept it. Both Kevin MCCormack, civil liberties, and Bryan Gould, regarded as one of New Zealands top intellectuals consider my book should not have been suppressed but generally people do not seem to care. I had no trouble with my first book. My suppressed book exposes the gross human rights malpractice of the UN and States, New Zealand and Bangladesh. It exposes the human rights truth which means it exposes the cause of so very many of our problems and also what needs to be done to correct the problems i.e. include the omitted human rights. Why people do not want to save humanity/planet from a self-destructive course is a never-ending major concern of mine.

In New Zealand we can do things differently to achieve sovereignty without becoming Alt-right. I propose an ethical bill of rights for New Zealand in my book (American Academic Press 2017) which has been suppressed. Ethical human rights is firmly based on the universal human rights truth as in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights so try as ‘they’ might it cannot be called Alt-right. So rather than demonizing those seeking sovereignty they will simply expose themselves as fraudulent because they are following a UN Agenda with many human rights omissions to ensure the destruction of global freedom including western civilization. Ethical human rights omit no human rights.The ethical approach to human rights which I promote involves duties but ensures sovereignty. The prime duty of the State is to ensure the ethical human rights of their own people. There are also global duties e,g. to help other countries where it is within our means to do so such as helping those countries unable to ensure ethical human rights for their people.Ethical human rights include both civil and political rights and economic, social and cultural rights. It ensures that the best and brightest are chosen and permits genius and the creative magic I consider that led to the dominance of western civilization. But it also ensures that no one is exploited which has been often a failure of the West especially with the decline of the Welfare State. Ethical human rights can be seen as a realistic dream which requires that all States ensure, at least, all the core minimum of the human rights in the Universal Declaration. Full human rights can be aspired to. Because ethical human rights omit no human rights it would eliminate ideology which involves many human rights omissions leading to divided countries and the decline of global freedom and western civilization. The ideologies which will be eliminated are neoliberalism, globalization as well as neoliberal absolutism created by the UN on 10 Dec 2008 described in my book but hidden by the fake global mainstream media. I consider neoliberal absolutism obviously suits a one world government whereby all countries would be subjected to extreme top-down control, a form of totalitarianism.I have written two books on ethical human rights and my suppressed book exposes the gross human rights malpractice of the UN and States, New Zealand and Bangladesh.
Ebook Link: My book, ‘Ethical Human Rights: Freedom’s Great Hope’ (American Academic Press, 2017). Ebook link provided by my publishers: https://books.google.com/books?id=Z3nYDQAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
Youtube video: Suppressed author exposes UN agenda. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bU_Eit8MpWs&feature=youtu.be
Also, see my blog, https://outsiderethicalhumanrights.home.blog