PS. It is more complicated than how I have explained it but is described much more fully in my book which has been suppressed but there is an Ebook see my blog, https://outsiderethicalhumanrights.home.blog.

Climate Change: I would side with the science if I was confident scientists were not captured by ideology. I promote ethical human rights which are firmly based on universal human rights truth as in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. If adopted it would eliminate ideology and place a greater emphasis on small/medium business rather than the Corporations which environmentalists consider is a major cause of climate change. However, the global establishment will not discuss the ethical approach to human rights which makes me strongly suspect they are captured by globalization which many Corporations strongly favor. I mean if climate change is as serious as they say then surely they should discuss all possibilities.

My post on the Association of Sovereignz: Like Katie Hopkins I also believe in standing up for western culture and what freedoms that still exist. In my view, domestically the major enemy of western culture is the fake liberals (following a UN Agenda) presently led by Jacinda Ardern. The fake liberals promote Islam (with its baggage of Islamic terrorism) and Maori tribalism to undermine western culture. Katie Hopkins is a brave straight talker when the silent majority is still extremely afraid of speaking out. My suppressed book shows just how ludicrous it is to follow the UN’s One World Government plans simply because it has hidden enormously important truths from humanity i.e. they simply cannot be trusted to preside over an OWG.

Freedom of speech and the fake media. In my suppressed book I describe the low cunning and gross deceit of the then New Zealand leaders. The following is just one example of how devious the control can be. 
It is sometimes said that Article 14 of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 provides for Freedom of Expression. However, in my 27 years as a human rights author (two books), activist and outsider and which is also described in my suppressed book, it needs to be understood that the mainstream media is controlled by who I describe as fake liberals (hence the term fake media) who are very different from the classical liberals who existed prior to when neoliberalism was implemented in New Zealand in 1984. 
My suppressed book shows how the fake liberals discriminate on the grounds of social class so can exclude any anti-mainstream views of those outside the establishment while it is the fake liberals who determine what is mainstream. 
The fake liberals believe in collective thought, collective conscience, and collective expression (the mainstream media provides their collective voice) whereas prior to neoliberalism the classical liberals believed in individual freedom of thought, conscience, and expression. The Freedom of Expression of Article 14 promises the latter but the fake media very largely ensures that only ‘their’ mainstream views are permitted. 
In my view, the poor should have a voice of their own in the mainstream media so they can influence the democratic majority. The latter would ensure that the mainstream media can never again hide what is happening to those struggling in New Zealand. Also, social class discrimination should be prohibited. The latter has been considered by the NZ Human Rights Commission and the latter should be encouraged to recommend it. Social class discrimination is described in detail in my suppressed book. There is an Ebook, see my blog, https://otsiderethicalhumanrights.home,blog

Terrorism/freedom of speech. It seems apparent that terrorism such as that which occurred in Christchurch (about 50 deaths) and more recently in Sri Lanka (over 250 deaths) is used to justify States cracking down on free speech. So one has to be suspicious when States fail to prevent terrorist acts, especially when forwarned. It was stated by one government official in Sri Lanka that the recent Islamic terrorist attack in their country was in retaliation for the attack on Mosques in Christchurch.

My suppressed book (American Academic Press 2017) in a chapter on Bangladesh (about 90% Muslim), which has been experiencing much Islamic terrorism, describes how a violent jihad can be replaced by a peaceful jihad by giving religions a greater voice in the mainstream. I describe how religions can form political parties Both Bangladesh and Sri Lanka are democracies so the latter is possible. Yet no academic or anyone in the global establishment will discuss it.

The religion-friendly ethical approach to human rights I promote would provide a challenge to the destructive ideology of the terrorists. It would give potential terrorists the opportunity to pursue a peaceful rather than a violent jihad but this would very likely involve my writing another book which seems pointless given that it is very likely to be suppressed as is the case with my last book.

Even though in 27 years as an activist I have not promoted violence I have a certain sympathy for the terrorists because I realize how utterly disingenuous the West is when it piously demands peaceful protest yet does everything conceivably possible to suppress certain truths which threaten its ideology.

Stupid individuals or stupid cultures? My post on the Association for Sovereignz which asks the question, ‘are New Zealanders stupid?’: Anthony Ravlich I have grappled with this. I think it better to see it as stupid cultures rather than stupid individuals who may have just failed to rise above ground zero when it comes to reaching their potential. I describe in my suppressed book how people’s potential has been severely crushed. Also, for example, I regard Maori and many Islamic cultures as stupid because they seem to believe that God is outside rather than within them. Or perhaps put another way they seem to regard their leadership as perfect i.e. God like. Surely only God is perfect not humans no matter how many divine revelations and blessings they may have had. This presents a major problem because Maori and it seems many Muslims refuse to hold their leaders to account because it would be much like disobedience to God/Allah. Consequently rather than serving the interests of the population the latter just serve the interests of their leaders who have every reason to want to stay in control and so channel discontent towards largely innocent countries (see George Orwell’s 1984 movie, its free).

Clash of civilizations or is it all orchestrated by the UN? My comment on the Association of Sovereignz: Anthony Ravlich PS. There is also a chapter on Bangladesh in my suppressed book. Bangladesh, which is about 90% Muslim, continues to experience much Islamic terrorism. In my book, I show how much of the problem stems from the UN and I also show how a violent jihad can be replaced by a peaceful jihad.
Anthony Ravlich PS. Re the latter comment it is a big question whether re Islam/Christianity were are dealing with a clash of civilizations or is it all orchestrated at the UN i.e. in my suppressed book I show how the UN is promoting totalitarian, repressive States and political Islam. As an outsider, I am not afraid to engage in an open discussion of this but the whole of society is subjected to phenomenal control – courage is desperately needed!!!!.

IDEOLOGY impacts as an invisible force. I cannot stress enough the importance of ideology which is like ‘the elephant in the room’ for nearly all modern people. The following is meant to just get you thinking on the subject. There is really so much to be said. But unless you want to follow in the footsteps of the yellow vests in France understanding ideology, in my view, will give you the best chance of peaceable change. Also, my suppressed book shows that if you keep seeking the truth YOU CANNOT LOSE (so do not give up!).
The reason why the fake left wants to suppress the truth and freedom of speech is that as my suppressed book proves, I consider beyond a shadow of a doubt, that the human rights truth is not on the side of the fake left. Put simply the fake liberals are about power, not a universal truth. 
The fake left is executing a UN Agenda based on gross human rights malpractice. The fake left, which domestically executes the UN Agenda, is based on human rights omissions created at the United Nations so it is not surprising that they want to suppress freedom of speech and the seeking of truth. 
The human rights omissions create ideology i.e. neoliberalism and globalization, which the fake left promote in the interests of the swamp and the establishment. The world is meant to be ruled by universal human rights truth as in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. By omitting human rights in the latter you create an ideology which is ‘the elephant in the room’ in nearly all political discussions because virtually all modern day people do not understand it so it is ignored. Yet virtually all MPs, academics, the whole establishment as well as nearly all people (aware of where their selfish interests lie are controlled by ideology – altruism is all but dead). 
But there was a time during the cold war when people were aware of ideology – it was America’s freedom and democracy versus the communism of Eastern Europe. But when Soviet communism collapsed in 1989 ideology went behind closed doors. Describing how it was done in New Zealand: NZ wasted little time in creating the ideology of the State in 1991. It was the seemingly innocuous NZ bill of rights act. The bill of rights was passed by only 36 percent of Parliament and was ‘by and for’ a left-minority, all of the latter were Labor MPs. If your human rights were not included you were overlooked. Most obvious was the exclusion of the rights of children and families who were overlooked with shocking effect e.g. child poverty and family violence. It was done behind closed doors so impacts as an invisible force because the bill of rights was driven by the bureaucracy.
Most sinister, the bill of rights reflected the UN’s agenda i.e. their human rights omissions. My suppressed book (there is an Ebook – see https://outsiderethicalhumanrights.home.blog) show, put simply, that the omissions aim to rid the world of genius and potential genius because the fake left fears the human rights truth will be discovered and how fraudulent and fake they truly are. 
In my suppressed book I describe the low cunning and gross deceit of the then leadership Sir Geoffrey Palmer (then PM and architect of the bill of rights) and Helen Clark (deputy PM). I go into great detail how NZers were conned using this seemingly innocuous bill of rights. It led to over a million NZers leaving the country including many of the best and brightest – the statistics of Kea NZ are very clear on this – leaving exceedingly few in the country who were able to challenge government policies. One Kea statistic is as follows: “Only 1% of overseas Kiwis say they have no formal qualifications, compared with nearly one quarter (24%) of New Zealand residents who say the same “(Kea New Zealand. 2011). My suppressed book shows how the potential of the nation was severely crushed also with the fake left promoting Maori tribalism to undermine western culture. For example, even though Maori are the lowest achievers at school they have a significantly higher percentage of MPs than existing of Maori in the general population. There is a significant section on Maori in my suppressed book and I also propose an ethical bill of rights which will benefit both Maori and Pakeha. An ethical bill of rights will include the omitted human rights as well as enabling Maori to challenge their leaders to address such discrimination based on whakapapa (family lineage) as well as helping to enable, for example, Maori social outcasts, to gain a share in the compensation being paid to Maori. But as with ideology and social class, the Maori issue is likely to take some time for New Zealanders to be able to cope with.

Posted on Bernie Sanders Activists 2020.

Global Slave Economy. Americans (and New Zealanders) will have to address the global big picture if they want to understand why the Corporations are benefiting from Trump’s economic policies. On the subject the thinking of Americans (and New Zealanders) are largely contained within national boundaries and they are not told about the enormous influence of the United Nations e.g neoliberalism and globalization.

The latter is because States are able use the UN to control much of the economic policies of States because it is away from the sight of national populations and voters i.e. the UN is an extension of government.

My suppressed book and previous posts describe the UN’s gross human rights malpractice part of which involves manipulating economic, social and cultural rights. The latter rights were meant to protect against exploitation but international human rights law allowed exploitation which portends a global slave economy. The Corporations then realized they could relocate to countries with cheap labor without fear of exploitation being prohibited. This happened on 10 Dec 2008 and in my view was the real cause of the global financial crisis. But academics are captured by the UN Agenda while, in my view, States remain loyal to the UN so refuse to discuss it whereas I as an outsider can. Also my book while published in America libraries globally will not hold it. However, there is an Ebook – see my blog, https://outsider.ethicalhumanrights.home.blog.

The problem is this – how to attract the Corporations back to America when a global slave economy is being offered. Of course Bernie Sanders is right, why should such wealthy Corporations enjoy tax cuts but how do you attract them back to America? In my view, the gross human rights malpractice of the UN needs to be addressed. But the latter has been determined by the great majority of States at the UN by omitting a number of human rights in international human rights law. These omitted human rights need to be included and one way is to elect political parties which can stand up to the UN.There are political parties in Europe standing up to the EU so standing up to the UN is not inconceivable After all, as my suppressed book shows the UN claims the Universal Declaration as its authority while the UN Charter requires all States to uphold the UDHR. Yet in what involves gross manipulation of the UDHR global freedom including western civilization has been determined for decline e.g. the EU suffered by far the most from the GFC 2008.

My comment on the Association for Sovereignz:
The control of the fake liberals over the population is in my experience truly phenomenal and that is globally not just in NZ. The fake liberals dominate the UN and EU bureaucracies. I regard people who want to enslave others as very sick frightened people.