US Mueller probe a distraction. My latest post: In my opinion, the Mueller probe was just a distraction by the Democrats wanting to hide (1) their promotion of neoliberalism and globalization created by the UN which my suppressed book shows aims to destroy global freedom, including western civilization, (2) to fulfill the latter purpose the suppression of intelligent white males from a western culture to crush human potential and consequently economic growth. Those who did not escape overseas often ended up in the mental health and criminal justice systems, even the underclass. When many of the latter understand what happened to them they are likely to be very angry. This is all described in my suppressed book. The best and brightest were excluded by giving so-called victims affirmative action. Radical women professionals (particularly feminists) and radical professionals of color aligned themselves with the fake liberals to target white males from a western culture. I would be more than happy to have an open public discussion of this and be held to account.

BOOK SUPPRESSION. My book while selling on Google Books and Amazon has been suppressed by libraries worldwide by, in my view, the dominant elite, the fake liberals. My book, ‘Ethical Human Rights: Freedom’s Great Hope’ (American Academic Press, 2017). Ebook link provided by my publishers: https://books.google.com/books… Youtube video: Suppressed author exposes UN agenda. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bU_Eit8MpWs&feature=youtu.be Suppression of my book is tragic according to the New Zealand Council of Civil Liberties. The book is Ethical Human Rights: Freedom’s Great Hope (American Academic Press, 2017). It describes the perversion of human rights at the UN determining the decline of western civilization. The following is an email from Kevin McCormack, The Secretary of the New Zealand Council for Civil Liberties, my only supporter in the establishment: 16 Mar Morning Tony Thanks for your e-mail. It is also a tragedy that your book is suppressed by NZ libraries. What reason is given for that refusal? Freedom of expression also contains the right to express a contrary view. My only caveat is that there is no denigration of another, although often it is difficult to separate the view from the person. Ideally, in my view, the presentation of different views enables a reader to compare and contrast and then decide which is the better. Much like a young child can very quickly determine which of 2 pieces of chocolate cake is the larger. However, the task is made inordinately more difficult by the way in which language is used, and few people seem to possess a formula which enables comparisons to be made on an objective basis. Also, a top NZ intellectual says there is no justification for suppressing my book: Email dated 19 Mar at 8:19 pm I can see no justification for suppressing a book – and from what I know of your work, I am satisfied that no such justification exists in your case. Kind regards, Bryan Gould Bryan Gould, a New Zealander who is a former British politician who once stood for the leadership of the UK Labor Party, is regarded as one of New Zealand’s top intellectuals – see Wikipedia which states: ‘Gould was awarded Companionship of the New Zealand Order of Merit in 2003 for services to Education. In October 2006, he was awarded an honorary doctorate by the University of Waikato. He is a board member of TVNZ’.