The UN and the Fact Checkers who claim the OWG is just a conspiracy theory are just B.S!!! United Nation’s Agenda 21/2030, Promote One World Government has been Fact Checked by logically as FALSE. https://www.logically.ai/factchecks/library/4697ce7d Expect them to try to convince you that you are a conspiracy theorist if you say otherwise.

If they have the guts (which, in my view, they haven’t!) they could Fact Check my book which shows that the UN promotes a OWG (I have provided my book for free on my blog, https:/outsiderethicalhumanrights.home.blog). I show how on the 10 Dec 2008 the UN created a new globally dominant ideology I call neoliberal absolutism which is obviously the ideology for OWG. I regard neoliberal absolutism as evil because people would not be able to think for themselves or even have a conscience of their own Neoliberal absolutism is reflected in international human rights law which in turn is reflected in numerous constitutions preparing populations for a form of totalitarianism required under OWG.

In addition, Fact Checking, supported by a grant from Facebook, claims that ‘there is no evidence that the U.N. will establish “öne world government” along with associated implications, such as a single military and currency” (see Fact Check: UN Agenda 21/2030 ‘New World Order is not a real document, Chelsey Cox USA Today, July 23, 2020)It states that Daniela Gross, a spokesperson for the U.N. Secretary General that the OWG claim is fabricated. “No, this is false. This is not a genuine UN document,” Gross wrote.

Fact Checkers, citing a number of sources, rate the OWG claim as FALSE stating:We rate this claim FALSE because it is not supported by our research. A claim suggesting the UN’s Agenda 21 and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development will establish “one world government” has been debunked by experts. A representative from the UN said that the agenda is not a genuine agency document.

However, it cannot prove my book wrong. Because the human rights omissions in international human rights law which creates the ideology for a OWG cannot be proved as false because it is plainly obvious to anyone by comparing the Universal Declaration of Human Rights with international human rights law where the human rights omissions are plainly obvious to anyone who bothers to check.

Talk/Discussion: The human rights truth will set you free. Wednesday, 2.30pm, 28th April, Old Government House, Auckland University. Anthony Ravlich MA, BSc, Dip Crim (Hons)Human rights author (two books), activist and outsider (28yrs)Chairperson, Human Rights Council (New Zealand)Ph: (09) 9409658https://outsiderethicalhumanrights.home.blog

The human rights truth will almost certainly set you free but it is not at all clear that New Zealand wants to be free. My book describes that of the Anglo-countries in the Five Eyes Alliance New Zealand is most likely to become totalitarian.In the past week according to the Guardian ‘ New Zealand’s stance on China has deep implications for the Five Eyes Alliance’, https://www.theguardian.com/…/new-zealands-stance-on…. NZ opted out of joining Five Eye declarations condemning China’s abuse of the Uyghur minority in Xinjiang. New Zealand’s stance surprised me. I did not think it would break ranks with traditional allies, in particular, further distancing itself from Australia after recent differences.The human rights truth is described in my second book, ‘Ethical Human rights: Freedom’s Great Hope’ (American Academic Press, 2017).

My book was greeted with an overwhelming silence by global leadership, ideologically captured academics, an utterly corrupted mainstream media and a fear ridden, timid, population who have been dumbed down and unable to defend itself. People fail to see that my book is being ignored because it is seen as a major threat to the UN’s New World Order.My book has been severely suppressed but I have provided it (in sections) for free on my blog for the rare few brave enough to read it, https://outsiderethicalhumanrights.home.blog.

To some extent all the above groups are complicit in undermining western culture by targeting its historical main defenders, intelligent white males including genius, for exclusion and exploitation. They were excluded by ensuring affirmative action (see the NZ Bill of Rights Act 1990) for so-called victims e.g women and blacks/Maori in NZ, who replaced intelligent whites most of whom fled overseas leaving New Zealand largely defenseless against governments seeking absolute control over the population.

My book shows that many of the worst problems being faced by humanity stem from human rights omissions in international human rights law which is meant to reflect the Universal Declaration of Human Rights i.e in finding a solution to our problems people need look no further than human rights although coronavirus is an exception but no doubt the control exercised is also motivated by the UN’s planned totalitarian countries.In my view, many of the dissenters waste their time seeking causes of many of our major problems other than the human rights omissions. For example, people often blame the 1% but fail to realize we live in a world of rules which invariably stem from human rights. The 1% can make more money because the rules permit it but people fail to ask the most important question – who makes the rules? In addition, capitalism is under attack but the anti-capitalists fail to recognize that the rules i.e. neoliberalism and globalization which involve human rights omissions, have grossly distorted capitalism. For example, the emphasis on the global rather than the domestic free market led to an emphasis on the corporations while small/medium business was suppressed. In my book I describe the latter suppression in three countries, America, New Zealand and Bangladesh. However, I do show how exploitation of both the poor and the intelligent was wrongfully permitted.

My book shows that on 10 Dec 2008 the UN created a new globally dominant ideology I call neoliberal absolutism. The ‘fake’ global media did not report it. I found it more by accident than design when following the progress of a human rights instrument at the UN from 2004 to 2008. I consider neoliberal absolutism, which is obviously the ideology for a One World Government, is evil because people would not be able to think for themselves or even have a conscience of their own.

Neoliberal absolutism rebalanced global ideological and economic power from the West to the Rest and I show it was the real cause of the Global Financial Crisis 2008. It determines the decline of the West and global freedom in preparation for a form of totalitarianism to dominate States required for the UN’s One World Government Agenda (New World Order). To my knowledge my book although published in America is in no American library and it took 2 ½ yrs to get one copy in New Zealand libraries. I believe I have been blacklisted as I have not been able to discuss my research findings with the numerous academics I have contacted.It was the great majority of States which ensured the human rights omissions to create neoliberal absolutism. The major dissent at the UN came from America although it had some support from the American camp, Canada, Britain, Australia and Japan. It is obvious to me that the left so-called liberals (Democrats in America and the Labour Party in New Zealand) are promoting the UN’s OWG agenda for the benefit of the establishment. In my view, they want total control over the population.

The human rights omissions are determined by the great majority of States in the UN General Assembly who seek the destruction of western civilization e.g. genius, and, in my view, in the ultimate, as mad as it seems, the destruction of civilization itself. (see my article on my blog, ‘Become backward or take society forward’).The solution to many of the major problems faced by humanity is to include the omitted human rights which the ethical human rights (see below) I promote does. To include the human rights omissions requires targeting the United Nations and human rights organizations, such as human rights commissions, Amnesty etc. and demanding the inclusion of the omitted human rights.The human rights omissions aim to eliminate creativity including, in my personal opinion, God who I regard as the creative force or genius within. In my view, eliminating creativity determines the decline of western civilization and global freedom. I do not think I could have finished my two books without God’s help because I was in poverty and worse virtually throughout.

Despite their previous virtual complete lack of interest I have invited many academics to attend this discussion. While I have never been afraid of them they have obviously been afraid of me because they have virtually completely ignored my research findings. Despite my work being verifiable with sources provided.In my view, today’s world can be likened to the pre-second world war period when George Orwell (1946) described the totalitarian mind-set of the intellectuals of his day in his article, ‘The Prevention of Literature’. He added that ‘a bought mind is a spoiled mind’ and he stated: “But what is sinister… is that the conscious enemies of liberty are those to whom liberty ought to mean most. The big public do not care about the matter one way or the other. They are not in favour of persecuting the heretic, and they will not exert themselves to defend him. They are at once too sane and too stupid to acquire the totalitarian outlook. The direct, conscious attack on intellectual decency comes from the intellectuals themselves” (Orwell G. (1946)).

.The chapter on the UN shows that the omitted rights in what could be called the UN’s ‘hidden’ collectivist agenda, often described as communist, are:1/ The right to individual self-determination (included in Art 22, UDHR) was omitted. This is the seeking of truth, hopes and dreams sometimes depicted by the iconic American superhero. Domestically I see the left so-called liberals promote the UN’s collectivist agenda, which is often regarded as communist, for the benefit of the swamp, including many on the right-wing of politics who support the corporations. The UN’s collectivist agenda is most clearly seen in international human rights law where in Part 1, Article 1 in both the UN covenants individual self-determination, which is included in the declaration, has been replaced by collective self-determination, which is not included in the declaration.2/ The omission of property rights (Art 17(1), UDHR) enables the plan of “The Great Reset” described by the World Economic Forum (WEF) which aims to bring sweeping changes to the world. The WEF states that in the Great Reset: “You will own nothing, and you will be happy.”Also excluded is non-discrimination with respect to intellectual property as well as duties to the community (Art 29(1), UDHR). The latter omissions allow the elites to regard human rights as their own intellectual property while having no duty to inform the public of human rights omissions and important human rights truth. 3/ Also excluded are the State’s core minimum obligations with respect to economic, social and cultural rights (mostly covering Art 23 to 27, 29 UDHR i.e there is no socio-economic bottom-line which permits extreme poverty and exploitation. As a result international human rights law permits exploitation. The failure of economic, social and cultural rights to protect against exploitation meant that China, in particular, was able to exploit its vast workforce and continue to have the competitive advantage over the west. Also, corporations realized they could relocate to countries with cheap labor without fear that exploitation would be prohibited. I consider the latter was the real cause of the Global Financial Crisis of 2008 which impacted by far the worse on the European Union. I consider neoliberal absolutism also portends a global slave economy. In my view, growth would be based on exploitation rather than creativity.The UN’s ‘hidden’ collectivist agenda seeks to promote collectives, including totalitarian and repressive States while also seeking to cultural cleanse the world of individual self-determination which, put simply, aims to culturally cleanse the world of genius (and, in my personal view, God!). People can visibly see the dominance of the collectives in society. While ideally all individuals in the collectives are meant to have freedom of thought, conscience and expression in reality they are controlled by the collective which follow ideology e.g. neoliberalism and globalization, while the mainstream media acted as their collective voice.I consider with the creation of neoliberal absolutism the West would be fully justified in boycotting the UN until the UN’s ‘hidden’ collectivist agenda is removed. The collectivist agenda involves major violations of the Universal Declaration which States are required to uphold under the UN Charter (see below). However, although I have tried hard over the past two years countries, Including America, refuse to fully challenge the UN head on.

Initially some of the major support for ethical human rights was as follows: Save the Children with 415, 226 followers. Save the Children describes itself as the leading independent organization creating lasting change for children in need in the United States and around the world. The support appeared on the internet as follows:@SavetheChildren ethical human rights, development, globalization to replace neo liberalism, anthony ravlich’s blog, guerilla media 13 Mar 12The Official Twitter account of the United Nations has 930,135 followers. It posted:@UN ethical human rights, development and globalization to replace neo liberalism, anthony ravlich, http://www.hrc2001.org.nz 13 Mar 12The following is the official U.S. Department of State twitter. It has 302,030 followers. It stated:@StateDept ethical human rights, development and globalization to replace neo liberalism, anthony ravlich, http://www.hrc2001.org.nz 13 Mar 12The following was from the Official Twitter account of the White House Open Government Initiative which has 484,120 followers:@OpenGov ethical human rights, development and globalization to replace neo liberalism, anthony ravlich, http://www.hrc2001.org.nz 13 Mar 12The Hill is a congressional newspaper that publishes daily when Congress is in session. It has 248,804 followers:@thehill ethical human rights, development and globalization to replace neo liberalism, anthony ravlich, http://www.hrc2001.org.nz 13 Mar 12Further support for ethical human rights can be found in the article, ‘ New idea for a better world’ (Scoop NZ, 25/07/2012).Despite all my attempts the mainstream media refused to inform the public of the support for ethical human rights.During the above talk/discussion I will describe social class discrimination (see my book) which has an enormous, far reaching impact on society, in my view, much worse than racism in today’s world, but very rarely talked about.I consider because of the gross deceit of the UN it cannot be trusted to preside over a One World Government. Ethical human rights, which emphasizes sovereignty, promises to replace neoliberal absolutism I,e the OWG. In the chapter on New Zealand I describe the low cunning and gross deceit of the leadership at the time of the creation of the NZ Bill of Rights Act 1990 which, like the UN, had a far greater impact than people were led to believe. I made two court appearances after making stands on principle and described the gross human rights violations of the NZ government but the mainstream media refused to inform people of the reasons for my court appearances.Even though I am convinced totalitarianism can be avoided New Zealanders may have to experience virtual total control to discover what it is like.(The following has been well hidden on the internet, ‘ Suppressed author exposes UN agenda’ Oct 19, 2018. https://www.youtube.com

My comment on a reaction to the Sound of Silence by Disturbed: The earlier version was sung in easier times. The above version reflected far more draconian times.

Those very low on the social scale were treated with viciousness and cruelty (see my book which I have made free on my blog). But people do not want to know about it.

In New Zealand very many intelligent white males fled the country and those who did not often ended up in the mental health and criminal justice system. I was one of those affected and was convinced no one was meant to survive the ordeal with their sanity intact and able to articulate what happened (I thank God I survived it). Of course they would not want to hear from me – how could they win. I experienced it.

On a matter of principle I did make a court appearance and told the Judge many had been crushed and isolated and he agreed with me. I said it was due to social class discrimination but also the people’s love of money blinded them to the truth.

Very largely those who regard themselves as ‘woke’ executed State policies. It is why cancel culture is so viciously cruel because the ‘victims’ were unable to defend themselves because the mainstream media used social class discrimination to exclude their voices.

For very many years I experienced a form of totalitarianism so know very well what I am opposing. Perhaps after watching the above song people may gain some insights into what happened without having to live it, see the video The Sound of Silence, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8xsawflG-6I P.S. I will be holding a meeting at Old Government House, Auckland University, on Wednesday 28 April at 2.30. I hope to write an article closer to the date which will describe what I will be talking about. Essentially my research shows that most of our major problems stem from human rights omissions in International Human Rights Law. I will be inviting academics, students and some on social media etc. Since promoting human rights in 1991 I refused to be silenced.

‘The last rats off a sinking ship’. My post on Mel K & Bob Really Expose the Great Reset Conspiracy Fact: Much that Mel and Rob Really have said has been said in my book, ‘Ethical Human Rights: Freedoms Great Hope (American Academic Press 2017) which I have provide for free (in sections) on my blog if you can access it https://outsiderethicalhumanrights.home.blog. I promote ethical human rights which is firmly based on universal human rights truth as in the Universal Declaration but I recognize the critical importance of American exceptionalism simply because the great majority of States at the UN cannot be trusted. My book has been severely suppressed e.g. to my knowledge it is in no American library. It is all very simple really – the UN omits many human rights in international human rights law which determine the decline of global freedom including western civilization while targeting intelligent white males, in particular, for exclusion because they are most likely to uphold thinking for oneself and western culture. The UN’s human rights omission promote totalitarianism and obedience. It is the left so-called liberals who promote the UN agenda for the benefit of the swamp. In my view, the UN and the swamp are the major enemies of humanity and in the ultimate, as mad as it seems aim to destroy civilization. I consider they aim to be the last rats off a sinking ship. PS. One of the human rights omitted is property rights which enables the plan of the Great Reset whereby everyone will own nothing and be happy.

The Great Powers, the New World Order and Ethical Human Rights.

In my view, America will remain on the path of self-destruction until it realizes it cannot serve two masters – its Constitution and the New World Order. While the patriots uphold the former the left so-called liberals i.e Democrats are, in my view, following the United Nation’s New World Order (NWO).

I consider the left so-called liberal’s actions should be regarded as traitorous and their leaders held to account.

Russia, hated by the left so-called liberals, seems, as was the Trump administration, also concerned to protect the country’s sovereignty. Russia is challenging the NWO promoted by the United Nations and China.

The latter are using a corrupted international human rights law to enable totalitarianism to dominate all States eliminating much sovereignty.

Ethical human rights, which emphasize sovereignty, promise to replace the corrupted international human rights law, the NWO, and remove the menace of totalitarianism world-wide.

Speaking at Davos 2021 Xi Jinping, President of the People’s Republic of China, stated: ‘We must champion the international rule of law’ and added that ‘without international law…we would fall back on the law of the jungle which would be devastating for humanity’ (The Big New World with a Smaller Population. Number of the Beast, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pMsS_oorOtU  ).

However, President Vladimir Putin of Russia speaking at Davos 2021 called for ‘the scraping of the 120-year British-American Pilgrim society “New World Order” Theory at the World Economic Forum (. https://aim4truth.org/2021/02/13/putin-advocates-love/  ).

Putin called the “centralized and uni-polar world order” a moribund strategy that has embroiled Russia and the world in more than a century of war and godless, culture-destroying monopolies.

He added regarding the removal of the NWO: “We are ready for this, we want this, and we will strive to make this happen. But love is impossible if it is only declared by one side. It must be mutual”.

In the chapter on the United Nations in my recent book (provided for free on my blog, https://outsiderethicalhumanrights.home.blog) I show that international human rights law is meant to reflect the UDHR however there are many human rights omissions resulting in the creation of a new globally dominant ideology, Neoliberal Absolutism, which I consider as ‘evil’ because people would not be able to think for themselves or even have a conscience of their own. The human rights omissions are described in chapter one of my book.

I show that Neoliberal Absolutism has determined the decline of the west and the rise of China. In my view, it was also the real cause of the Global Financial Crisis 2008 which impacted by far the worse on the European Union.

I see Neoliberal Absolutism resulting in a fanatical control that would destroy creativity which I consider led to the dominance of western civilization (also, in my personal view, it aims to destroy the creative force within which I regard as God).

America was the major opposition to the NWO ideology, Neoliberal Absolutism, created at the UN on 10 Dec 2008. I describe momentous decisions made by the UN on 10 Dec 2008 which the global mainstream media refused to report. The Trump administration was consistent with America’s dissent at the UN and promoted sovereignty and the American Constitution rather than follow the dictates of the NWO. However, the present Biden administration and the Democrats are likely to be much more supportive of the NWO and China.

Because the NWO promotes totalitarianism it seeks to destroy the freedom that exists in the west and ultimately, in my view, in a world devoid of much creativity the existence of civilization itself is seriously threatened.

In my view, because the left so-called liberals as the dominant elite want total control over the population they strongly favour totalitarianism over freedom and, in my view, as mad as it seems even civilization itself. This left so-called liberal democratic elite who also serve the interests of many on the right wing of politics are best described as a suicide or death cult. It aims to destroy western culture and its major supporters, intelligent, white males who they regard as an intellectual threat and likely to exercise dissent. They denigrate the latter’s intelligence and creativity as ‘white privilege’ and use cancel culture to shut them down.

I consider big tech, who strongly favour globalization, align themselves with the left so-called liberals (and the ‘swamp’) as well as the NWO. 

In the chapter on ethical human rights in my book I show that it simply requires that all States ensure, at least, the core minimum of all the human rights in the UDHR. It is firmly based on the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and unlike Neoliberal Absolutism has no human rights omissions. Ethical human rights promise to replace Neoliberal Absolutism and consequently the New World Order. Ethical human rights protect humanity from totalitarianism which was a major reason for the creation of the UDHR after the second world war which was preceded by the global rise of totalitarianism.

My book describes how New Zealanders have been deliberately kept ignorant of human rights. For example, Section 5a of the Human Rights Act required the NZ Human Rights Commission to educate people in human rights however I was informed by the Manager of the Commission that the Government would not fund it.

In my view, in the pursuit of the NWO, it is very likely that countries will be required to abide by international human rights law resulting in totalitarian and repressive States. In fact, this has already been happening for a long time without people being aware of it (see the chapter on NZ on my blog).

More can be found on my blog (see link above) and if people wish to ask me any questions as I am, to my knowledge, the only outsider aware of what happened at the UN on 10 Dec 2008, which I discovered by accident, they can ring me on (09) 9409658, Auckland, New Zealand. Also, if there is interest I can provide a free human rights talk covering the material in my recent book.

My post on Sky News Australia, Alan Jones, ‘Its not taken long to see the ramifications of a weak left-wing Biden Presidency’: Alan I have provided my book for free on my blog. It describes the gross human rights malpractice of the UN. The UDHR is meant to protect humanity from totalitarianism instead, using human rights omissions, the UN is promoting totalitarian and repressive States [includes China]. Australia (unlike the US) having ratified the covenant on economic, social and cultural rights is in a position to seriously challenge the UN’s New World Order by raising the ethical human rights, which emphasizes sovereignty and would replace the NWO, in the UN General Assembly. At least some Australia media could report it. Why is the global establishment so extremely afraid of me that they must keep me extremely isolated. Give me a ring, (09)9409658, Auckland, New Zealand. I am a human rights author (2 books), activist and outsider (29yrs) – see my blog, https://outsiderethicalhumanrights.home.blog. Globally things are looking quite ugly – the UN is promoting international human rights law which all must obey but read my book to see how human rights have been manipulated to determine the rise of China and the decline of the west.

One Nation Under God. The following proves that in the end truth triumphs over low cunning and gross deceit: Exposing election fraud and the theft of America by enemies Foreign and Domestic, https://michaeljlindell.com/ (Facebook fact checkers cannot possibly know the truth because my recent book, free on my blog, shows that I found the human rights truth so the fact checkers are frauds).

My post on Sky News (Australia). ‘Australians are losing the ability to fight back’ against socialist movements (Feb 5). They cannot beat me so they isolate me. It has been that way virtually since I adopted the UDHR as my belief system in 1991. I just state that I believe in universal human rights truth as in the UDHR and they avoid me like the plague. I have written two human rights books and have posted by last book for free on my blog. In my last book I describe how an individual can be master of their own destiny. It describes the right to individual self-determination i.e. the seeking of truth, hopes and dreams (sometimes depicted by the iconic American superhero). Individual self-determination requires that an individual has sufficient individual freedoms e.g. freedom of thought, expression, as well as sufficient welfare. I do not regard the latter as socialism but rather as an enlightened welfare. In other words to be master of one’s own destiny an individual needs, at least, the core minimum of individual freedoms and the core minimum of welfare rights. In other words the individual would be free from extreme violence and extreme poverty. Supranational bodies such as the UN and the EU can hold States accountable for providing the core minimum human rights but leave States with considerable sovereignty for providing higher levels of human rights. It is human rights omissions (determined by the great majority of States at the UN) which is the cause of most of our major problems e.g. capitalism has been greatly distorted by neoliberalism/globalization which involve human rights omissions. See my blog:

Unfortunately I was unable to comment on the following video, ‘China has poked holes and broken into key western alliance’, https://www.skynews.com.au/details/_6226896782001 as I could not locate a comment section. But I will say something here. Australia just does not seem to realize what a very timid country New Zealand has become. My book (free on my blog) shows the creation of an ‘evil’ ideology at the UN, Neoliberal Absolutism, on 10 Dec 2008 which promotes totalitarianism and China. New Zealand grovels before this evil ideology while, in my view, nearly all New Zealanders prefer to avoid the truth i.e. they would rather not know. My book shows that the NZ Human Rights Commission almost designated NZ a secular society. It was the Catholic Church which intervened successfully before such a designation. Rarely is the national anthem, God Defend New Zealand, heard. The latter helps explain its close relationship with the Chinese Communist Party. But also few New Zealanders have any understanding of totalitarianism i.e. what virtual total control is like. My book describes much that happened to those low on the social scale which New Zealanders prefer to remain blissfully ignorant. After making a stand on principle I told the High Court Judge, Lyn Stevens, that social class discrimination resulted in the creation of underclasses. The Judge agreed with me but the mainstream media refused to report it as a ‘New Zealand tragedy’. Neoliberalism impacted as a form of totalitarianism on those low on the social scale. In my view, because of the dumbing down of the country many intelligent New Zealanders (who could best defend the country) fled to Australia. In my view, many who did not leave ended up in the mental health and criminal justice system. Even though I have made my book free on my blog I doubt whether many New Zealanders will have the courage to read it, https://outsiderethicalhumanrights.home.blog

My comment on Sky News, ‘New Zealand will become ‘vassal state’ of China if it continues to snub Australia’ https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=259140998981868I am a human rights author (two books), activist and outsider (29yrs) from Auckland, New Zealand. Anyone who reads my book (which I have provided for free on my blog) will see that of the Anglo countries NZ is most likely to align itself with totalitarianism. Very many of our best and brightest fled to Australia because of the reverse discrimination against intelligent white males who were most likely to dissent against government policies. As a consequence there are extremely few individuals articulate enough to challenge our government. In fact at one stage I informed the ‘five eyes’ not to trust NZ which is subservient to the UN’s New World Order which promotes totalitarianism as well as China. Since the onset of neoliberalism (1984 in NZ) which permitted exploitation China has had the competitive advantage over the West. The UN when dealing with economic, social and cultural rights on 10 Dec 2008 looked as though it might prohibit exploitation which economic, social and cultural rights are meant to do. Instead the UN permitted exploitation under international human rights law allowing China to continue to gain the competitive advantage over the West. In addition I show how the UN’s decision permitted corporations to relocate to countries with cheap labor without fear of exploitation being prohibited. In my view, the latter was the real cause of the GFC 2008. Perhaps not surprisingly my book has been severely suppressed but now I have provided it for free on my blog, https://outsiderethicalhumanrights.home.blog. Hopefully Australians might have more spine to read it. Australia (unlike America) which has ratified the covenant on economic, social and cultural rights is in a position to raise the ethical human rights I promote at the UN. Ethical human rights which is firmly based on the UDHR and which emphasizes sovereignty, promises to replace the New World Order as well as oppose totalitarianism and China – see my blog, https://outsiderethicalhumanrights.home.blog phone: (09) 9409658