the following is my comment on a video entitled: AUKUS: Why are France and China so Angry about this Pact? I make a suggestion for France at the end of the comment:
I am at a serious disadvantage here because my book has been severely suppressed (I do provide it for free on my blog) so it is very difficult to explain to people what happened at the UN on 10 Dec 2008 because in such an ideologically controlled world it has been hidden. But I will try.
At the time the UN created a new globally dominant ideology. The world is meant to be under the control of universal human rights truth as in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights but the ideology omitted many human rights which would lead to the decline of the West and global freedom.
The major opposition to the new globally dominant ideology I call neoliberal absolutism was America with some support from the American camp, Canada, Britain, Australia and Japan. The great majority of the States were responsible for the human rights omissions. So it is not surprising to see the creation of AUKUS consisting of America, Britain and Australia because they are more like-minded. To my knowledge France was not in the American camp.
This is a case of American exceptionalism but if America did not take the stance it took at the UN on 10 Dec 2008 neoliberal absolutism would have gained almost the full support of the UN General Assembly. Neoliberal absolutism certainly seemed to be the ideology for a One World Government which requires all countries to have a form of totalitariansim. In other words people would not be able to think for themselves or even have a conscience of their own which, in my opinion, would be evil.
What needs to happen, in my view, is for the omitted human rights to be included to eliminate the threat of totalitarianism which the UDHR is meant to protect humanity from. Then communist China would pose much less of a threat and there would be less need for AUKUS.
My blog still survives but Facebook has alll but destroyed my F/B page while I lost access to Linkedin many months ago. They obviously fear my book which is called ‘Ethical Human rights: Freedom’s Great Hope (American Academic Press 2017) which I have provided for free (in sections) on my blog: https://outsiderethicalhumanrights.home.blog. Its my second book and I have been promoting human rights since 1991. To become more geopolitically relevant I think France should encourage Russia to become part of the European Union.

The following is my comment on Tom MacDonald’s ‘Brainwashed’: I don’t care much for rap. But he is right virtually the whole world is brainwashed. The technical definition is that virtually all are ideologically controlled. The ideology is determined by the great majority of States at the UN. The ideology is a corruption of the Universal Declaration of Human rights creating international human rights law which is invariably reflected in national consititutions and promoted by the left so-called liberals – the woke – for the benefit of themselves and the whole establishment. People very often fail to see the connection between the UN and the major problems they face. God willing I plan to address the UN General Assembly after the coronovirus scare is over. I intend to expose the gross deceit of the UN where human rights omissions to create ideology has been concealed. It has also been concealed by the global mainsteam media and ideologically controlled academics and the human rights establishment are too terrified to discuss the UN’s human rights omissions because it will undermine the legitimacy of the UN and virtually the whole global establishment. Whereas people are too terrified of being called rascist, sexist or homophobic to speak out. In my view, the rapper is right virtually the whole world has been brainwashed. I enjoyed his rap. Tom MacDonald ‘Brainwashed’ https://lifeanddeathandallbetween.wordpress.com/2021/09/19/tom-macdonald-brainwashed/?c=28682#comment-28682

My comment on Bolt, Sky News (Aust) ‘ Arder’s ‘woke politics’ leading New Zealand towards ‘ a form of apartheid’, Sept 15, 2021, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qq17gKFAds4 :
Thanks Mr Bolt. In my view NZ desperately needs outside help. I am a human rights author (two books), activist and outsider (30yrs) from Auckland, New Zealand. I provided my book with a sizeable Maori section for free on my blog but few appear to have read it because it has been severely suppressed. I consider the left so-called liberals, the woke, promote Maori tribalism to undermine western culture. I am afraid a terrified right wing say little effectively supporting the woke. NZers terrified of being called racist are not prepared to challenge government’s policies wrt Maori. It needs to be remembered that affirmative action policies led to the best and brightest fleeing the country (going mainly to Australia) leaving few articulate enough to challenge government policies. Another program on NZ would help because as you see below your program has enouraged many NZers to speak out. They need the practice! But beware the woke will very likely fact check you. In my opinion they are out to destroy western civilization and as mad as it seems (because I see them as sick!) are even willing to sacrifice civilization itself.

I have just sent the following email to Russia Today concerning an interview on worlds apart with Mahbouba Seraj, Executive Director of the Afgan Women’s Skills Development Center.

Dear Oksana Boyko,

I watched your interview with Mahbouba Seraj. I gained the impression that there are many Afgan women, at least the thinking women, who want to resist the Taliban leadership. I agree with you that the Taliban will not be bought off with money.

It is interesting that India’s Gravitas WION has adopted the cause of women in Afghanistan constantly stating how they have been ‘abandoned by human rights champions around the world’. However, I am one human rights activist prepared to offer a little support, a little, because I am no expert on women.

It occurred to me these thinking women might benefit from the ethical human rights I promote. I have written two books on the subject. It involves a duty to inform people of important human rights truth. Rather than mass killing it is non-violent simply involving a voice, speaking out. It could be described as a peaceful jihad.

In my view, the only way I can see that the Taliban can justify killing innocent people is in self-defence i.e they have no other choice. By promoting ethical human rights women could show them they do have a choice – see my most recent post on my blog where I hope to make public the gross deceit of the UN by addressing the UN General Assembly, https://outsiderethicalhumanrights.home.blog. I have to because unbelievably virtually the whole world is controlled by ideology rather than universal human rights truth. Ethical human rights are based on universal human rights truth and is equivalent to the Golden Rule – ‘do unto others as you would have them do unto you’ – which all the major religions, including Islam, support (explained more fully in my chapter on Bangladesh in my recent book, ‘Ethical human rights: Freedom’s Great Hope’ (American Academic Press, 2017).

Of course, I do not know the mind of God but I think with God’s help they will be unable to convince themselves that they have no choice in the matter. The women need to show them that there is a choice.

In my personal view, in contrast to ideology, universality reflects the nature of the soul and ultimately God’s absolute universal truth.

You may consider it worthwhile passing this email onto Mahbouba Seraj.

I enjoyed your interview.

Thank you,

Anthony Ravlich Human rights author (two books), activist and outsider (30 years)

Chairperson Human Rights Council (New Zealand)

10D/15 City Rd., Auckland City.

Ph: (09) 9409658

Mob 0226986063

My recent article has been published by Indian Newslink – a fairly mainstream fortnightly newspaper which caters for all ethnicities. It can be searched using the following: ‘Ethical human rights are a great idea whose time has begun – Indian Newslink.

Violation of human rights will spell decline of the West

Ethical human rights are a great idea whose time has begun.

America and the West need to face up to the geopolitical reality that many countries do not want full democracy.

But what can be expected of all countries is that they ensure ethical human rights for their people which means, at least, the core minimum of all the human rights in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Ethical human rights also have global duties e.g. to help those States unable to provide the core minimum human rights for their people.

Put simply ethical human rights protects people against extreme violence which includes extreme poverty and to that extent the world can be described as one. My book (see below) shows that ethical human rights enable the individual, State and World to achieve Greatness.

Whereas the world’s major dream is the UDHR ethical human rights can be regarded as a realistic dream requiring at least the core minimum of the human rights in the UDHR so as with the latter are based on universal human rights truth.

Ethical human rights can more easily be understood by people as being equivalent to the Golden Rule, ‘do unto others as you would have them do unto you’, which is supported by all the major world religions. The Golden Rule is described in depth in the chapter on Bangladesh in my more recent book (see below). In my personal view God is the creative force or genius within.

The above geopolitical reality was pointed out by Alexey Arestovich, a senior advisor to Andrey Yermak, the chief of staff to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.

According to Alexey Arestovich the American failure to defeat the Taliban and build a strong democracy in Afghanistan proves that not everyone has signed up to the West’s ideology and the world does not want to take part in idealist political experiences (‘After Afghan defeat, west must realize that not everyone wants democracy with ‘Netflix & LGBT marches’ – senor Ukrainian official, https://on.rt.com/betr , Jonny Tickle, 18 August 2021).

At present Biden is seeking a coalition of democratic countries to counter both China and Russia which is reminiscent of the cold war (Democracy Now, NATO ramps up rhetoric against China and Russia. Is Biden leading the US into a new cold war, June 16, 2021, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9APe-jF7Cc8 ).

By contrast a focus on ethical human rights would be less confrontational and not beyond the capacity of the superpowers to achieve. Higher levels of human rights such as full democracy would be a matter of choice for each country. The UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights has already determined most of the core minimums for economic, social and cultural rights such as the rights to health, social security and housing (see General Comments, the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/15/treatybodyexternal/TBSearch.aspx?Lang=en&TreatyID=9&DocTypeID=11 ). While domestic courts often have much experience of civil and political rights and could determine the core minimums of the latter.

My recent book, ‘Ethical Human Rights: Freedom’s Great Hope’ (American Academic Press 2017) describes how having both the core minimums of civil and political rights (self-help rights) and economic social and cultural rights (survival rights) would permit individual self-determination or being master of one’s own destiny. It enables the seeking of truth, hopes and dreams sometimes depicted by the iconic American superhero (I provide my book for free, in sections, on my blog: https://outsiderethicalhumanrights.home.blog) .

Ethical human rights emphasize sovereignty and is a major challenge to the One World Government aspirations of the UN which is described in my book.

My book also describes the gross deceit of the UN which concealed the creation of a new globally dominant ideology, Neoliberal Absolutism, on 10 December 2008, obviously for OWG. I show how Neoliberal Absolutism omits many human rights from International Human Rights Law which lead to the decline of the west and global freedom in preparation for a form of totalitarianism in each country. In my view, the omissions pose a grave threat to civilization itself.

The global mainstream media failed to report these major UN decisions on 10 December 2008 and because of the UN’s gross deceit I do not consider it fit to preside over OWG.

The emphasis of ethical human rights is on the domestic free market, small, medium business, rather than the global free market and the corporations. And to the extent that climate change is real a lesser emphasis on the corporations may improve climate conditions as well as improving the habitat of the wildlife. Furthermore, smaller companies rather than big tech such as Google, Apple, Facebook, Amazon and Microsoft would be emphasized.

The human rights omissions are described in my book as well as a much more recent post on my blog entitled: ‘Virtually all out major problems stem from the UN but the world is too terrified to talk about it’. However, in the latter post I omitted the major problem of the coronavirus which while unlikely a UN creation would surely fulfil the totalitarian purposes of the UN.

In my view, the reason why the global establishment refuse to talk about the human rights omissions is because humanity would lose much confidence in human rights, which although a corrupted version is the major source of legitimacy for the UN and virtually all of the global establishment.

I now wish to address the UN General Assembly who were responsible for the human rights omissions. I would promote ethical human rights which would include the human rights omissions. I am presently seeking the support of a State to help me address the UN General Assembly when I arrive in New York, the home of the UN.

While I am not totally reliant on the support of a State It would be of enormous assistance to the success of what I see as my duty.

Ethical human rights are a great idea whose time has come.

America and the West need to face up to the geopolitical reality that many countries do not want full democracy.

But what can be expected of all countries is that they ensure ethical human rights for their people which means, at least, the core minimum of all the human rights in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Ethical human rights also have global duties e.g. to help those States unable to provide the core minimum human rights for their people.

Put simply ethical human rights protects people against extreme violence which includes extreme poverty and to that extent the world can be described as one. My book (see below) shows that ethical human rights enable the individual, State and World to achieve Greatness.

Whereas the world’s major dream is the UDHR ethical human rights can be regarded as a realistic dream requiring at least the core minimum of the human rights in the UDHR so as with the latter are based on universal human rights truth.

Ethical human rights can more easily be understood by people as being equivalent to the Golden Rule, ‘do unto others as you would have them do unto you’, which is supported by all the major world religions. The Golden Rule is described in depth in the chapter on Bangladesh in my more recent book (see below). In my personal view God is the creative force or genius within.

The above geopolitical reality was pointed out by Alexey Arestovich, a senior advisor to Andrey Yermak, the chief of staff to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.

According to Alexey Arestovich the American failure to defeat the Taliban and build a strong democracy in Afghanistan proves that not everyone has signed up to the West’s ideology and the world does not want to take part in idealist political experiences (‘After Afghan defeat, west must realize that not everyone wants democracy with ‘Netflix & LGBT marches’ – senor Ukrainian official, https://on.rt.com/betr , Jonny Tickle, 18 August 2021).

At present Biden is seeking a coalition of democratic countries to counter both China and Russia which is reminiscent of the cold war (Democracy Now, NATO ramps up rhetoric against China and Russia. Is Biden leading the US into a new cold war, June 16, 2021, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9APe-jF7Cc8 ).

By contrast a focus on ethical human rights would be less confrontational and not beyond the capacity of the superpowers to achieve. Higher levels of human rights such as full democracy would be a matter of choice for each country. The UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights has already determined most of the core minimums for economic, social and cultural rights such as the rights to health, social security and housing (see General Comments, the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/15/treatybodyexternal/TBSearch.aspx?Lang=en&TreatyID=9&DocTypeID=11 ). While domestic courts often have much experience of civil and political rights and could determine the core minimums of the latter.

My recent book, ‘Ethical Human Rights: Freedom’s Great Hope’ (American Academic Press 2017) describes how having both the core minimums of civil and political rights (self-help rights) and economic social and cultural rights (survival rights) would permit individual self-determination or being master of one’s own destiny. It enables the seeking of truth, hopes and dreams sometimes depicted by the iconic American superhero (I provide my book for free, in sections, on my blog: https://outsiderethicalhumanrights.home.blog) .

Ethical human rights emphasize sovereignty and is a major challenge to the One World Government aspirations of the UN which is described in my book.

My book also describes the gross deceit of the UN which concealed the creation of a new globally dominant ideology, Neoliberal Absolutism, on 10 December 2008, obviously for OWG. I show how Neoliberal Absolutism omits many human rights from International Human Rights Law which lead to the decline of the west and global freedom in preparation for a form of totalitarianism in each country. In my view, the omissions pose a grave threat to civilization itself.

The global mainstream media failed to report these major UN decisions on 10 December 2008 and because of the UN’s gross deceit I do not consider it fit to preside over OWG.

The emphasis of ethical human rights is on the domestic free market, small, medium business, rather than the global free market and the corporations. And to the extent that climate change is real a lesser emphasis on the corporations may improve climate conditions as well as improving the habitat of the wildlife. Furthermore, smaller companies rather than big tech such as Google, Apple, Facebook, Amazon and Microsoft would be emphasized.

The human rights omissions are described in my book as well as a much more recent post on my blog entitled: ‘Virtually all out major problems stem from the UN but the world is too terrified to talk about it’. However, in the latter post I omitted the major problem of the coronavirus which while unlikely a UN creation would surely fulfil the totalitarian purposes of the UN.

In my view, the reason why the global establishment refuse to talk about the human rights omissions is because humanity would lose much confidence in human rights, which although a corrupted version is the major source of legitimacy for the UN and virtually all of the global establishment.

I now wish to address the UN General Assembly who were responsible for the human rights omissions. I would promote ethical human rights which would include the human rights omissions. I am presently seeking the support of a State to help me address the UN General Assembly when I arrive in New York, the home of the UN.

While I am not totally reliant on the support of a State It would be of enormous assistance to the success of what I see as my duty.

Dear Adrian Blaser (Consulate of Switzerland),

I am sending the following email to various State Consulates in Auckland. Would Switzerland help me address the UN General Assembly when I arrive in New York?:I understand Switzerland is not a member of the EU but if the latter adopted the Ethical human rights I promote it would mean that the EU would only hold States accountable for violations of the core minimum human rights i.e. extreme violence and extreme poverty. The latter would leave States with considerable sovereignty to determine higher levels of human rights. If that were the case Switzerland might reconsider its decision not to join the EU. My promotion of ethical human rights at the UN could lead to the EU eventually adopting ethical human rights. By helping me address the UN General Assembly would seem to lend legitimacy to Switzerland’s independent role in foreign relations. My experience so far indicates that States are terrified of disloyalty to the UN even though they have seriously corrupted human rights because now they promote totalitarianism instead of protecting humanity against it.

” I am a human rights author (two books), activist and outsider (30 years) from Auckland, New Zealand. I want to address the UN General Assembly and am looking for a State State to help me when I travel to New York. When I was following a human rights instrument at the UN from 2004 to 2008 I discovered major decisions made by the UN on 10 Dec 2008 which the global mainstream media refused to report. It is described in my book, ‘ Ethical human rights: Freedom’s Great Hope’ (American Academic Press, 2007) which I have provided (in sections) for free on my on my blog, https://outsiderethicalhumanrights.home.blog. My book has been met with an overwhelming silence and I am very sure I have been black listed.I show that the UN decisions have determined the decline of western civilization and global freedom (as well as being the real cause of the Global Financial Crisis 2008). While I am sure many in the UN General Assembly would know what they have done it is not discussed in public. I want to ‘ light a fire’ and make it public.” While I am not totally reliant on gaining the support of a State I think it would greatly improve my chances of success,

thanks

Anthony Ravlich MA, BSc, Dip Crim (Hons)ChairpersonHuman Rights Council (New Zealand)10D/15 City Rd., Auckland City.Ph: (09) 9409658Mob: 0226986063

Dear Consulate General (America),

I am sending the following email to various State Consulates in Auckland. Would America help me address the UN General Assembly when I arrive in New York?: While I promote ethical human rights I recognize the importance of American exceptionalism (see my posts).

” I am a human rights author (two books), activist and outsider (30 years) from Auckland, New Zealand. I want to address the UN General Assembly and am looking for a State to help me when I travel to New York. When I was following a human rights instrument at the UN from 2004 to 2008 I discovered major decisions made by the UN on 10 Dec 2008 which the global mainstream media refused to report. It is described in my book, ‘ Ethical human rights: Freedom’s Great Hope’ (American Academic Press, 2007) which I have provided (in sections) for free on my on my blog, https://outsiderethicalhumanrights.home.blog. My book has been met with an overwhelming silence and I am very sure I have been black listed.I show that the UN decisions have determined the decline of western civilization and global freedom (as well as being the real cause of the Global Financial Crisis 2008). While I am sure many in the UN General Assembly would know what they have done it is not discussed in public. I want to ‘ light a fire’ and make it public.” I am now finding it almost impossible to communicate on the internet so I am sorry if the above is distorted. I am not reliant on getting State assistance but it would enormously improve my chances of success.
thank you,

Anthony Ravlich MA, BSc, Dip Crim (Hons),ChairpersonHuman Rights Council (New Zealand)10D/15 City Rd., Auckland City.Ph: 9409658Mob: 0226986063
Dear Pierre Delorme,

I am sending the following email to various State Consulates in Auckland. Would Canada help me address the UN General Assembly when I arrive in New York?:

” I am a human rights author (two books), activist and outsider (30 years) from Auckland, New Zealand. I want to address the UN General Assembly and am looking for a State State to help me when I travel to New York. When I was following a human rights instrument at the UN from 2004 to 2008 I discovered major decisions made by the UN on 10 Dec 2008 which the global mainstream media refused to report. It is described in my book, ‘ Ethical human rights: Freedom’s Great Hope’ (American Academic Press, 2007) which I have provided (in sections) for free on my on my blog, https://outsiderethicalhumanrights.home.blog. My book has been met with an overwhelming silence and I am very sure I have been black listed.I show that the UN decisions have determined the decline of western civilization and global freedom (as well as being the real cause of the Global Financial Crisis 2008). A While I am sure many in the UN General Assembly would know what they have done it is not discussed in public. I want to ‘ light a fire’ and make it public.” I am now finding ing ing it almost impossible to communicate on the internet so I am sorry if the above is distorted,

Dear Reinhold Goeschi,

I am sending the following email to various State Consulates in Auckland. Would Austria  help me address the UN General Assembly when I arrive in New York?:

” I am a human rights author (two books), activist and outsider (30 years) from Auckland, New Zealand. I want to address the UN General Assembly and am looking for a State State to help me when I travel to New York. When I was following a human rights instrument at the UN from 2004 to 2008 I discovered major decisions made by the UN on 10 Dec 2008 which the global mainstream media refused to report. It is described in my book, ‘ Ethical human rights: Freedom’s Great Hope’ (American Academic Press, 2007) which I have provided (in sections) for free on my on my blog, https://outsiderethicalhumanrights.home.blog. My book has been met with an overwhelming silence and I am very sure I have been black listed.I show that the UN decisions have determined the decline of western civilization and global freedom (as well as being the real cause of the Global Financial Crisis 2008). A While I am sure many in the UN General Assembly would know what they have done it is not discussed in public. I want to ‘ light a fire’ and make it public.” I am now finding ing ing it almost impossible to communicate so I am sorry if the above is distorted,

Dear Jeff Liu (Taiwan Consulate, Auckland),

I am sending the following email to various State Consulates in Auckland. It may be in Taiwan’s interest to encourage a State to help me address the UN General Assembly when I arrive in New York:

” I am a human rights author (two books), activist and outsider (30 years) from Auckland, New Zealand. I want to address the UN General Assembly and am looking for a State to help me when I travel to New York. When I was following a human rights instrument at the UN from 2004 to 2008 I discovered major decisions made by the UN on 10 Dec 2008 which the global mainstream media refused to report. It is described in my book, ‘ Ethical human rights: Freedom’s Great Hope’ (American Academic Press, 2007) which I have provided (in sections) for free on my blog, https://outsiderethicalhumanrights.home.blog. My book has been met with an overwhelming silence and I am virtually certain I have been black listed.I show that the UN decisions have determined the decline of western civilization and global freedom (as well as being the real cause of the Global Financial Crisis 2008). While I am sure many in the UN General Assembly would know what they have done it is not discussed in public. I want to ‘ light a fire’ and make it public. I have spent the past two years trying to get America to inform the public without success”.
thank you,

Anthony Ravlich MA, BSc, Dip Crim (Hons),10D/15 City Rd., Auckland City.Ph: 9409658Mob: 0226986063